Poetry for Palestine

WARNING:

If you read, share or take part in disseminating the QUOTES below, then beware, in our Orwellian World, you might find yourself confronted with logic ad absudum that leads to semi-certain bizarre conclusion:

Filed under: Articles | Leave a comment »

Jewish-Only Organizations . . . A Closer Look

Due to recent events of alienation and/or expulsion of members of Palestine Solidarity Movement, including Palestinians, it became more and more evident that there are elements in the Solidarity Movement who continue to stir up friction and splits amongst activists, that leads to alienation of many genuine activists and even exiled Palestinians.

Such elements also continue to cause distraction by filtering information to prevent members from understanding the role of the larger Jewish communities world wide in influencing their respective governments to support “Israel”, and to deflect from scrutinizing the role of UK Jewish community and its DEEP TIES with “Israel”.

Moreover, such obfuscations would undoubtedly prevent the public from understanding the impact of racist ideology on the standpoints, attitudes and behaviour of the Jewish-settlers in Occupied Palestine and on Jewish communities who support them world wide, and the implication of such ideology on Palestinians;

This state of affairs should raise alarm to anyone interested in Justice and Peace, that means anyone who works to put an end to decades of Palestinian suffering, and its slow genocide, and to anyone who understands that such high objectives require promoting the Liberation of Palestine.

It is also apparent that many of these destabilizing elements are simultaneously members of OTHER organizations, which membership approval operates through exclusivity, and restricted only to people of Jewish background.

Moreover, it is manifest that many of these Jewish-only organizations declare publicly that their prime motive for their activism is out of concern for the welfare of “Israel” and the “Israeli society”. Worse, some of these organizations do not even conceal that their criticism of “Israel” is done out of “love” and loyalty to this criminal entity. Simply put, they criticise and condemn “Israel” primarily to protect and help it thrive and survive.

This kind of blind allegiance and deep loyalty to “Israel” is of course expected from and omnipresent amongst hyper-Zionists and their circles, but it is quite disturbing to find the same loyalty amongst “supporters of Palestine” of Jewish background. It is also interesting to notice that even hyper-Zionists, through their think tanks, have recently arrived to the same conclusion that their counterparts Jewish anti-Zionists have known for decades; namely open criticism of “Israel” IS the best way to defend it. As we can see for example, in Mick Davis’s article: “Open debate is our best way of defending Israel in the diaspora,” The Jewish Chronicle, 17 June 2010. The article also appears on the website of the Jewish Chronicle under the title “Defending Israel in the diaspora”.

Although, I acknowledge that there are many Jewish individuals who might -on the personal level, feel real and sincere sympathy for the suffering of Palestinians and the injustice against them, it is however, quite obvious that a major motive for the activism of many members of such organizations is the concern for the possible rise of anti-Semitism because of the illegality and the impossible-to-hide criminality of the “Jewish state”, hence, one of their principal aim becomes the prevention of anti-Semitism.

Through my research and extensive work, it became evident that the prime allegiance and the principal concern of many Jewish anti-Zionist organizations is not to Palestine or the Palestinians; their loyalty is to the global Jewish communities, to the welfare and future of “Jewish-Israelis” and to the security and perpetuation of the artificially manufactured colonial society in Palestine.

Factual and thorough scrutiny of these organizations invariably indicates that their primary concern and main focus are the following:

How to best consolidate and reinforce a good, secure and thriving future for the INVENTED *** “nation” of “Israel”, on the Historical Land STOLEN from its ancestral inhabitants, the Palestinians;

How to best exculpate the Jewish communities worldwide from their responsibility of decades of financial, protective, political, moral and even military support of their “beacon of light”, “Israel”;

How to best further the interests of such invented “nation”, after the finalization of their imposed facts on the grounds, and getting rid of the banner of Zionism;

How to best ensure and secure the permanent presence of an invading settler society after grabbing most of the LAND of Palestine by wars of terror and conquest;

How to best pacify and allure Palestinians into accepting foreign violent invaders as rightful co-owners of Palestine and future “partners”;

How to best promote “Israeli” settler society as “liberal peace-loving”, whose main concern would be to live in peace and security, but who just happened to be “unfortunately” plagued with corrupt leadership;

How to best conceal that their garment of humanism and thin veneer of ethics is directed principally at “saving Israelis from themselves” and thereby their own reputation, rather than unconditional and altruistic protection of the dispossessed, terrorised, besieged and occupied Palestinians, and their moral cause of Liberation.

How to best use their own narrative of the Holocaust as a “unique unprecedented” event like-no-other in human memory, the “eternal suffering” of the Jewish people that has “no equal in the history of mankind”, and anti-Semitism as global, “intrinsic” and “incurable” hatred for the Jews, as unquestionable dogmas to justify the need for a “homeland” for the Jewish people, hence to secure the permanent colonization and take over of Palestine.

How best to divert the limited energy of activism into supporting “Israeli peace camp”, “Israeli” organizations, and “Israeli” individuals and treat as angels and heroes those of them who exhibit a minuscule doze of normal human behaviour;

Dual-loyalty to two opposed parties, one being the torturer, and the other being his victim, is in practice a myth. Thus it is not surprising that those involved operate in secrecy, in the exclusion of “the others side”.

While non-Jewish candidates are barred from becoming member, by definition membership to Jewish-only organizations is open to ANY person from Jewish background. This makes it piece of cake for Sayanim, Mossad agents, Shin Bet and Zionist sympathisers to effortlessly infiltrate, manipulate and steer such organizations. No wonder then, that so many Jewish-only groups who claim to be “pro-Palestinians” appear to be more interested with aims more in tune with securing the presence of “Israelis” in Palestine, than the restoration of Palestinian sovereignty.

This brings us to the core problem: while those members of Jewish-only organizations have the privilege (and rightly so) to be members and never excluded from pro-Palestinian organization, the opposite is not true. i.e we are faced with an alarming phenomenon whereby, Palestinians and non-Jewish individuals are systematically excluded from participating, having an input, debating, voting, influencing or even being informed about or simply being aware with the inner dynamics and the type and topics of discussions that takes place inside such Jewish-only organizations.

The outcome of such asymmetrical and un-mutual arrangement is what we have seen lately, matters are discussed amongst these exclusive groups, decisions are taken, and then the pro-Palestinian organizations are approached, persuaded, pressured or coerced to adhere to those propositions and motions.

The secrecy and lack of transparency surrounding that type of activities is allowing inside the solidarity movement people who are not necessary or entirely genuine supporters of Palestine, “fair-weather friends“, people who are in essence more interested in the long term “Israeli” interest, than genuine support of Palestine. At best, their claimed care for the suffering of the oppressed society come secondary.

Signing petitions, giving out leaflets, stating words of support, throwing some crumbs to Palestinians, accompanied with patronizing pats on the shoulders, believing that they have done their humanistic “duty” of siding with justice, while simultaneously continuing to aim and work for securing the right of the invading “Israelis” to practice their “self determination” in someone else Homeland, reflects no doubt ethical blindness and almost moral bankruptcy. Imposing on Palestine forced marriage with a rapist monster is an obscenity.

Such ethical inconsistency of crying with the victim while protecting the criminal, is a regrettable case of hypocrisy and self deception.

Throughout the Palestinian movement, recent events reveal that some people on board of our movement deleterious to the Palestinian cause and some probably are disingenuous. Thus, such unhealthy, asymmetrical and exclusionary structures are indeed destabilizing and crippling the efficiency of Palestine Solidarity Movement, an efficiency vital to a Palestinian population under threat of annihilation… these are not trivial matters.

As a matter of principle, we refuse to apply the same exclusionary methods amongst pro Palestinian organization and will never resort to such racist exclusiveness. We cannot continue to claim to be humanist anti-racist while accepting simultaneously, the exclusionary nature applied by such organizations, especially in the light of compromised loyalty, and what we know about the sinister Mossad activities and the ease with which they infiltrate such groups.

It is therefore essential to crack open the shells of exclusion and secrecy, wherein topics of discussions are about “unfavourable” information to filter, which debates to “allow” and where to draw boundaries, which motions to propose and which one to oppose, and where  sinister attacks against activists who might not conform to “permissible” line of discourse are cooked.

Under such conditions, it is imperative for the Palestine Solidarity movement to introduce a regulation that will allow room for transparency and reciprocity. Failure to address this issue would cause the continuation and aggravation of the crippling shift that has already befallen the movement.

.

Whereas, unfounded accusations of racism and anti-Semitism against individuals from Jewish background and against others, are used to benefit the occupier; to silence dissenters and push out freethinkers, only on the say-so of a few members in the movement, who claim the exclusive right to define and identify racism and anti-Semitism;

Whereas, such accusations and character assassination of activists does not in any shape or form advance the cause of Palestine nor alleviate Palestinian suffering, but rather mirrors Zionist methods and plays directly in their hands;

Whereas, this “war of words” can only weaken the Solidarity Movement by causing distraction, wasting of time and energy, and putting in the spotlight, yet again, people of Jewish background, bickering between themselves about their identity, while shifting the focus away from the core issues: PALESTINIANS and the LIBERATION of PALESTINE;

Whereas these very same self-claimed “anti-racists, anti-Zionists” participate in the spreading of Zionists driven racial and religious hatred against Arabs, Muslims and Islam, thereby participating in tearing apart our fragile social fabric whose richness was precisely based on diversity, inclusiveness, egality of chances, irrespective of race or religion,

Whereas, they continue to expose their ignorance as they pose themselves as “experts” on the Middle East, attempting to discredit the Islamic Resistance Movements by painting it to the unknowing Western reader as non-representative of the Arab masses but rather a creation the Zionist Mossad, thus shamelessly distort the reality on the ground and conceal the pulse of the Arab street,
(see quotes at the end of article)

Whereas some Jewish-anti Zionist supporters call for a two state solution with a thriving and secured Israel they love, whereby they actively support the theft of 80% of Palestine;

Whereas some others insist that the only solution should be a one secular state, one person one vote, whereby they establish a precondition that would not only exculpate the occupiers from any responsibility or blame but also grant the occupier lands that does not belong to them, rights that they have not earned and protection that they don’t deserve.

Whereas, many of those Jewish “anti-Zionists” are full members of the Palestinian movements and have the privilege to be part of and to vote in any organization they desire;

Whereas, they continue to exclude Palestinians and other non-Jewish individuals from being part of and voting in their Jewish-only organizations;

Whereas, Zionist methods of false accusations of anti-Semitism / Holocaust denial are used to neutralize and exclude, or push away certain members of the Solidarity Movement, including Palestinian refugees! (a crass mirror of the ethnic cleansing happening in Palestine);

Whereas, Jewish anti-Zionist individuals and groups have the right to vote and have the weight to even tilt the vote, have access to the minutes of meetings and have the privilege of being heard and their opinions respected in the broader solidarity movement;

Whereas, such affiliated Jewish groups, by the very names and nature, do generally restrict their membership to Jews, hence barring non-Jewish persons from participating, or from having the right of access to their meetings as an observer, let alone from a vote within their tightly knit fellowship;

Whereas, the fundamental element of trust about the authenticity of intentions, about motivation, aims, and actions of such groups, has been profoundly shaken;

It appears evident that:

To put an end to this predicament, the exclusionary nature of such organizations must be revoked, and the fair and mutual openness to membership without discrimination against race, culture or religion must be requested.

The Solidarity Movement needs to have a system of disclosure of political affiliation of its prospective members, making it a contractual obligation of disclosure of their membership to any hitherto Jewish-only organization, or to any other organization linked to either the Palestinian cause, or to the occupiers of Palestine aka “Israelis”.

Representatives of the Solidarity Movements must have the mutual right to have access to and to be fairly represented in the insofar exclusive Jewish-only organizations, in equal numbers, and have rights to vote in these organizations.

To avoid any further mistrust, friction, crippling or fragmentation, reciprocity and mutual open membership is the way forward.

——————————————————————————————————————–
——————————————————————————————————————–

Quotes:

“The subsequent emergence of Islamism holds a false promise. While it poses a challenge to Western domination, it is backward looking and inherently unable to deliver progress” ~~~ Moshe Machover

“the Quoran also have passages that are chauvinist and today, in the context of state policy, would undoubtedly be deemed racist“~~~ Tony Greenstein

“Islam has introduced sectarianism into the Palestinian movement and has nothing to offer but further division“~~~ Tony Greenstein

Addendum:

Like many others, I was recently attacked with the usual slander-words “racist, antisemite” (for writing this article) My mud-slinging antagonists were not mouth-frothing Zionists, but Jewish members from inside the Solidarity movement, whom I used to consider as “friends”, and who know me well and for many years. As soon other friends came to my defence, the accusers -probably feeling a bit awkward, had the brilliant idea to declare that they do not actually accuse me as a person but it’s rather my article which is racist, and is at fault! Therefore, and to their address, I end this article with a note of humour in form of some disclaimers:

• Disclaimer 1: The views expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect those of the author, they are the sole responsibility of the article itself.

• Disclaimer 2: Healthy Criticism of some Jewish Organizations is NOT anti-Semitic.

• Disclaimer 3: Political Disagreement is Kosher… Thinking independently is not a Sin… and Striving for Liberation is Halal.

Filed under: Articles | 6 Comments »

EXCERPT:

“The singular triumph of the Zionist movement is that it invented a state and a people – Israel and the Israelis – from scratch. The first Hebrew-speaking child in 1900 years, Ittamar Ben-Avi,was not born until 1882. His father, the brilliant linguist Eliezer Ben-Yehuda, created a modern language for him to speak by improvising from the language of the Bible.”

MJ Rosenberg @ Information Clearing House

EXCERPT:

“This attempt to justify Zionism through genetics is reminiscent of the procedures of late nineteenth-century anthropologists who very scientifically set out to discover the specific characteristics of Europeans. As of today, no study based on anonymous DNA samples has succeeded in identifying a genetic marker specific to Jews, and it is not likely that any study ever will. It is a bitter irony to see the descendants of Holocaust survivors set out to find a biological Jewish identity: Hitler would certainly have been very pleased! And it is all the more repulsive that this kind of research should be conducted in a state that has waged for years a declared policy of ‘Judaization of the country’ in which even today a Jew is not allowed to marry a non-Jew.”

Shlomo Sand. The Invention of the Jewish People. Verso, 2009.

EXCERPT:

“When we speak of ‘Palestinians’ or of the ‘Arab population [of Palestine]’, we must bear in mind their Canaanite origin. This is important because their legal right to the country stems…from the fact that the Canaanites were first, which gives them priority; their descendants have continued to live there, which gives them continuity; and (except for the 800,000 dispossessed refugees [of 1948 along with the 25,000 expelled just prior to and during Israel’s first invasion of Egypt in 1956 and the additional more than 400,000 driven out during and after the war Israel launched on 5 June 1967]) they are still living there, which gives them present possession. Thus we see that on purely statistical grounds they have a proven legal right to their own land.”

Professor Ilene Beatty, Historian/anthropologist and “Holy Land” specialist:

“Arab and Jew in the Land of Canaan” 1957
.

Filed under: Articles | 2 Comments »

Strangling Life is GENOCIDE

More than six decades of this, when will the world stand up and say ENOUGH is ENOUGH

====================================

The Genocide Convention

Article 2 of the United Nations issued Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide states:
“any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group as such:
1. Killing members of the group; [Israel …guilty]

2. Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; [Israel …guilty]
3. Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; [Israel …guilty]
4. Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; [Israel …guilty]
5. Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.”
Article 4 states:
Persons committing genocide or any of the other acts enumerated in Article 3 shall be punished, whether they are constitutionally responsible rulers, public officials or private individuals.

The Palestinians have been ethnically cleansed, and undergoing GENOCIDE since over six decades.

Please raise the issues with those around you, and complain to:

UN Special Adviser on the Prevention of Genocide
http://www.un.org/en/preventgenocide/adviser/contactform.asp?address=1
The International Criminal Court
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR)
Palais des Nations
CH-1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland
Telephone: +41 22 917 9220
Email: InfoDesk@ohchr.org
The US Department of State
http://contact-us.state.gov/app/ask

Filed under: Articles | Leave a comment »

If you are one of those who think it might be a good idea to properly investigate the crime of 9/11; you become a “conspiracy theorist“.

Worse, if you somehow have a niggling doubt in your heart about the “factual narrative” of the event, and secretly, deep inside your head, think the words: “inside job“; you become a heretic.

But far far worse, if you suspect that a “foreign entity” might have a hand in it, that for sure qualify you as a full blown anti-Semite.

The 9/11 narrative of the establishment, like other previous narratives, is sacred.

To be an Agnostic, is NOT permissible.

To have doubts is NOT an option.

To struggle with believing is a criminal act.

Worse, to disbelieve; you are in for a lot of trouble. . . BE WARNED.

…
Imagine the surprise of the officers when these terror suspects turned out to be Israelis

Zionist Involvement in 9/11

• 1 Acknowledgments
• 2 Control of World Trade Center Complex
  • 2.1 Four key Zionist Network assets
  • 2.2 WTC Security In Zionist Hands
    • 2.2.1 Pre-Knowledge of Anthrax Mailings
    • 2.2.2 Who Killed John O’Neil?
  • 2.3 Airport Security In Israeli Hands
• 3 Prior Knowledge
  • 3.1 Gomel Chesed Cemetery Incident
  • 3.2 Israeli Citizens Get Tipped Off
  • 3.3 Anomalous trading in the Securities Markets
  • 3.4 Other forewarnings
• 4 Mossad connections
  • 4.1 U.S. Army Study: On Mossad
  • 4.2 Israeli espionage around 9/11
  • 4.3 After 9/11 – More detentions of Israelis
  • 4.4 Five Dancing Israelis
  • 4.5 “We are not your problem”?
  • 4.6 Truck Bomb Destined for George Washington Bridge
  • 4.7 Mural Van
  • 4.8 Urban Moving Systems
  • 4.9 Israeli Intelligence and P-tech
    • 4.9.1 Ptech Software systems – computer control backdoor
  • 4.10 MITRE corporation (computer software)
  • 4.11 Precision guided plane?
  • 4.12 Rabbi Dov Zakheim and Systems Planning Corporation
• 5 The US Military Knows Israel did it
  • 5.1 Zionism and Treason
• 6 Cover Up
  • 6.1 9/11 Investigation in Zionist Hands
  • 6.2 All appointed chief judges were Zionist Jews:
  • 6.3 9/11 Commission: Zionist controlled
  • 6.4 Crime Scene Evidence Quickly Removed and Destroyed
• 7 Zionist 9/11 Personalities
  • 7.1 Zionist Jews in all the Right Positions!
• 8 Who was on board flight 11?
• 9 Bush Speech Writers Grossly Inflate Number of Israeli Casualties
  • 9.1 Who was Bush’s Speechwriter?
• 10 Mohammed Atta Leads Us Directly To Jewish Crime Network Doorstep
• 11 Al Qaida = Mossad Playing Dress Up
• 12 Netanyahu Openly Gleeful of 9/11 Terror Attacks
• 13 Likely Architect of 9/11
• 14 Connected Events Lead to Israel
  • 14.1 Zionist would-be terrorist incident at the Mexican Congress Building
• 15 Quotes From Prominent People
  • 15.1 Former Italian President agrees, says Mossad did 9/11
  • 15.2 Former Pakistani ISI Director Says it was Mossad
• 16 See Also
• 17 References

Never mind all the above, if you find that laws of physics are broken, blame your thick scull, if you find that testimonies contradict the conclusion, blame it on your hearing aid, if the images don’t make sense, blame it on your new glasses.

It’s so simple you see, all you have to do is to believe; just have faith in the “religion” and its own “Ten Commandments”:

Now, repeat after me: “I Believe in 9/11”

“Thou shall Never Forget 9/11”

“Thou shall believe the official narrative of 9/11 and every other narrative as told by the establishment”;

“Thou Shall be called a “conspiracy theorist”, if you ask any questions or voice any doubts”

Thou Shall be called a heretic, if you think of words like “inside job”;

Thou Shall be called an anti-Semite if you think words like “outside job”;

“Thou Shall bless and serve angelic Israel with all thy heart”;

“Thou shall never use words like: Cover-Up“;

“Thou Shall put the needs and security of Israel above your own”

“Thou Shall glorify the gurus of the 9/11 commission and only mention their names with reverence”

“Thou Shall learn about the “facts” from a very young age”

“Thou Shall establish a 9/11 memorial museum in every city”

“Thou Shall wage a “war on terror”, against the “Islamist enemy”, indefinitely”

“Thou Shall sacrifice your privacy, freedom and intellect, at the altar of security”
.

Filed under: Articles | 3 Comments »

A Case Study:

On the 14 December I received this email from Sam S. one of the founders of our local group of “Jews for Peace and Justice”.

I am sharing his email with my readership to give people the opportunity to see an example of the dishonourable methods of ad hominem attacks and character assassination, used (in this case against me) to stifle the debate. Pursuing their objectives, they stop at nothing; in this incident, they even try to exploit my personal pain and sorrow for the loss of my late beloved husband as a way to intimidate me into silence. All I can say is that I find their tricks nauseating and sick to the core.

Please read my comment following Sam S. email (Emphasis mine):

From: Sam S.
Date: 14 December 2011 01:20
Subject: Unchallenged Lies
To: Nahida

Dear Nahida,

You will be aware that over the last couple of years I have not been directly involved with the various issues that have lead to an emerging schism between you and certain members of …… Friends of Palestine. However the review by Gilad Atzmon of David Landy’s book “Jewish Identity & Palestinian Rights – Diaspora Jewish Opposition to Israel”, which appears on “Uprooted Palestinians” leaves me no choice but to speak out.

I refer to the third and fourth sentences of the eighth paragraph, which are as follows:

“Admired Palestinian poet and writer Nahida Izatt was also cleansed. This time it was no Israeli or a ‘Zionist’ who barred her from her local Palestinian solidarity group ……”

The assertion that you were “cleansed” and “barred” from …… Friends of Palestine is a blatant lie as you well know. Your consort may have not been allowed to record a meeting which you were unable to attend or certain articles from the Group’s website, to which people have objected, may have been removed while the matter is being investigated. However to twist this into being “cleansed” and “barred” is a total misrepresentation of what happened.

Yet you allow this rubbish on “Uprooted Palestinians”. What in the world has happened to you? Where is the Nahida who for years we all loved and respected as a sincere, sensitive and most levelheaded person? You tell people that Gaza changed you but I find it hard to believe that Gaza has caused you to sink to the depths where you can countenance the appearance of such lies as in the Atzmon review.

I might be tempted to follow your line of reasoning, which claims that Judaism is responsible for the settlers ethnically cleansing the Palestinians, and claim that Islam is responsible for your accepting that which you know to be untrue. But having known “the old Nahida” and Khalid I know this clearly is not the case.

I can only wonder what Khalid would make of all this and wish that he were here to resurrect the Nahida I once knew.

Regards,

S… S…

==============================

Nahida’s comment:

After more than two years of evasion, shunning and ostracism, and after the failure of the defamation and smear campaign used by his consorts, Sam S. pops up on the scene. Not to wish me well or to ask about my health after a major surgery, and not to apologize and show remorse for being heavily involved in causing harm to my family two years ago, but to cause even more hurt and rub more salt on the wound.

With a sinister heartless move, using carefully chosen words and employing emotional manipulation, psychological pressure, and dishonourable use of the memory of my beloved husband Khaled, while knowing fair well the immeasurable amount of pain and hurt that such highly charged, extremely insensitive words would cause, Sam S. ends his letter with: “I can only wonder what Khalid would make of all this and wish that he were here to resurrect the Nahida I once knew“.

Being familiar with my private life through my open nature, Sam S. misuses this entrusted knowledge of my deep love and admiration of my late husband Khaled, to psychologically manipulate and pressurize me in order to influence my political views and quieten my voice. By doing so he aims to suppress information which I deem crucial to the success and advancement of our Palestinian cause.

Here is only one example of the appalling consequences of Sam S. and associates’ effort to defame and smear my character; hence discredit my research, evident in the blog of his friend and comrade Tony Greenstein:

“In Liverpool a Palestinian activist, Nahida, who was once the mainstay of the group, changed almost overnight when she married a sinister Dutchman. Jewish conspiracies took over her life and it was with difficulty that the branch reclaimed its website, which had posted links to her anti-Semitic website (‘Spiders Web’).”

Sam S. uses offensive expressions like: “sink to the depths” and “What in the world has happened to you? Where is the Nahida who for years we all loved and respected as a sincere, sensitive and most levelheaded person?” to try to humiliate, demean, put down and cast shadows over my “current” character. Evading addressing the issues and facts I investigate for two years in my articles, Sam S. chooses to direct his attention and attack to the alleged “change” in my “current” character.

Furthermore, in this loaded paragraph he says: “I might be tempted to follow your line of reasoning, which claims that Judaism is responsible for the settlers ethnically cleansing the Palestinians, and claim that Islam is responsible for your accepting that which you know to be untrue. But having known “the old Nahida” and Khalid I know this clearly is not the case.”

What a twisted ploy! Sam S. openly equates my exposure of real racism and supremacy thriving amongst Jewish settlers, with ignorant, racist, hate-filled Islamophobes, and by doing so hopes to subdue me and persuade me to stop exposing such wicked ideology.

The above paragraph represents a clear exposure of the agenda behind their effort; i.e what Sam S. and his circle (including Greg D.) are trying to conceal, namely the link between the atrocious behaviour of the Jewish settlers in Palestine and the supremacist ideology that animates them. In essence, preventing activists from investigating and understanding the deeper motives behind the Zionists crimes.

Moreover, Sam S. omits to mention that his ignominious email is not an innocent and spontaneous response to some thing that he accidentally came across as he wants me to believe, but rather collusion between himself and other members, who following a meeting on 7th December had decided to write a letter to Nahida about “unchallenged lies”.

It has become exceedingly clear to me and many others in the movement that the agenda of those who try to silence me has nothing to do with facts and truths, but rather with a precise agenda that aims to:

1) Conceal the ideology of Jewish-Zionist Supremacists and their highly influential global networks;

2) Suppress the fact that this ideology and networking directly affect Palestine and the Palestinians;

3) Muzzle and discredit people who expose such information;

4) Sideline and alienate individuals who promote the FULL Liberation of Palestine, those who put the welfare of the suffering Palestinian before that of their oppressors, those who endorse the FULL and unconditional reinstatement of Palestinian rights.

For the record:

With regards to that sentence pulled up by Sam S. and his crowd from Gilad Atzmon’s article, and then used as a pretext to write his odious email, by dubbing it “Unchallenged lies”, a bit of clarification is needed:

1) The article in question to is NOT my article. I am not responsible for other people’s writing.

2) Uprooted Palestinians is NOT my website, I am only a contributor there. My personal blog is “Poetry for Palestine”.

3) As I understand, Gilad Atzmon wrote that sentence because of his own interpretation of my writing; he thought that I was actively barred from LFoP.

4) As soon as I read Gilad Atzmon’s article I contacted him immediately to let him know that his information was not correct, I had not explicitly been barred. Then some time later I sent him an email explaining exactly what happened. A copy of my email to Atzmon is at the end of this letter.

5) When I spoke to Gilad Atzmon, he apologized and told me that this was his misunderstanding.

6) However, while I was indeed not explicitly “barred” from the group, I have been pushed out implicitly, and that is irrefutable and glaring.

To make things worse, being the only Palestinian in this group, I am entitled to consider this eviction as a hypocrites’ version of ethnic cleansing.

I don’t think that any person with the slightest sense of dignity and self respect would accept to be part of an organization that has amongst its members people whose tactics include such dishonest, disloyal and dishonourable methods of filtering, defamation of dissenting members, lies, insults, accusations, ad hominem attacks, meddling in private affairs of members, and spread rumours and slander far and wide etc etc. This does not constitute debate, democratic discussion, rebuttal of opinion, open communications, or any of the normal internal dynamics of a group, association or political group. I do not know why would people want to remain part of a group where certain members resort to such methods to impose their position on others to achieve their own dubious agenda, and to make things worse without ever being sanctioned or expelled.

7) In addition, it must be said that the alienation from the group started two years ago. Up until now I refrained from talking about it publicly. Suffice it to say that some members, including Sam S. , subjected my family to high level of psychological manipulation that has caused grave harm and excruciating pain to me and my children, putting an unimaginable strain on my private life.

About four months ago, the alienation was exacerbated when members of the local Jews for Peace and Justice (JPJ) – of which Sam S. is a founding member, tried to coerce me to stop writing about the supremacist ideology that thrives amongst some Jewish Hasidic groups. Instead of contacting me directly to discuss the issue, they cowardly went behind my back to contact a Palestinian Friend, asking him to “have a word” with me to invite me to stop writing about these issues. It appears that I overstepped JPJ’s boundaries of what is “allowed” in their carefully crafted, narrowly defined margin of political discourse. Apparently I have entered an area of truth too uncomfortable to them. Because they project themselves as “anti-racists”, I naively thought I was doing them a favour by bringing this information to their attention, that they would appreciate my efforts to expose such racist ideology.

One month later, the alienation reached its peak with the libellous letter signed Greg D. and Tom B. The subsequent defamatory activities culminated in what practically equated to a “trial” during the 5th October monthly meeting, which was conducted in absentia, where even the most elementary legal right of the accused to defend herself was crudely avoided. My article was removed from the website, and I noticed that even my own blog “Poetry for Palestine” had been simultaneously flagged, causing a WARNING sign to pop up next to my blog’s link stating that “The Link to this Website have been removed from some pro-Palestinian Websites, because the content of this Website is highly “controversial”, my advise to all …“

8 ) By failing to address any of the facts and solid information that I present in my writing, and using someone else’s misinterpretation as a pretext, Sam S. and his clique continue their fervent attempts to cover up truths and stifle debate. McCarthyism revisited?

This leaves me perplexed as to why they are so desperate to conceal the ideology of Jewish settlers in Palestine. Could it be that one/some of them have some close relatives who are ideological settlers whom they are keen to protect? I wonder!

9) In an attempt to demoralize me by destroying my reputation, Sam S. spreads rumours about a “change” of my character, hence to debase me and to discredit my views and my writing as coming from an “unstable” character. Instead of acknowledging the truth and addressing the real political and intellectual issues that I raise, Sam S. continues to hide behind the myth he created (the “lost old Nahida“, “who for years we all loved and respected as a sincere, sensitive and most levelheaded person?“).

Sam S. fails to see that the change is a change in my political views, clarified by FACTS not myths, due to the discovery of a whole set of new information along with aggravated circumstances in Palestine. The elucidation and strengthened analysis, reflected in my writing, manifest itself as a more confident, more vigilant, more outspoken, more assertive and more resolute Nahida. These qualities are fully compatible with sincerity, sensitivity and being level-headed.

10) Some of the facts and information that were instrumental in refining my political position were:

• Having witnessed the atrocities in Gaza, 2009;

• Observing the intensifying of the murderous actions of the occupiers;

• Confronted with the incessant creation offacts on the ground, rapid change of the face of Palestine, ever-increasing lies and ever-escalating crimes of the Jewish state;

• Stumbling upon the supremacist ideology of Chabad and the wide support it enjoys amongst religious Jewish leaders and the the implication of such ideology on Palestinians;

• Discovering the frightening level of influence that such a group and its associates have;

• Confronted with the double talk of many “anti-Zionist” groups, it became obvious to me that their aims have nothing to do with Liberation of Palestine, but rather the future security and prosperity of the Jewish state. The main reason of their criticism of “Israel” is out of “love” and loyalty to this criminal entity, they criticise it primarily to protect and help it thrive and survive.

• Watching with utter horror a displayed exhibition by the local Jews for Peace and Justice group –ironically, during a BDS event- titled “Another Israel: Celebrating Israeli voices for peace”, in which a list of Israeli “Peace” groups along with stories of their courage, “great” achievements and impeccable morality were hyped and glorified, giving the impression that most of the “Israeli” society is a humanistic, civilised and moral society… “but too bad it’s run by a corrupt government.”

In conclusion:

Neither “dormant racism”, nor “concealed anti-Semitism”, nor alleged “change of character”, nor the influence of asinister Dutchmanand not even a Flying Dutchman for that matter have anything to do with their malicious claims. It is rather the above facts that have lead to profound transformation in my political views, my assertiveness, my confidence and my vision for the future of Palestine.

I can no longer allow myself be trapped inside the narrow framework drawn by people who do not have the interest of Palestinian people 100% at heart, people who use dishonourable methods to muzzle the debate, people who lack the intellectual integrity to tackle the subjects of concern and shy away from exploring and challenging the serious topics that I investigate, and choose instead smear and character assassination as methods of “intellectual engagement”.

In this day and age, racism is finally understood by decent human-beings to be a thing of the past. It is viewed with revulsion and contempt, but when a majority of a society (by their own admission) becomes infected with such ills, then it’s up to the decent people of world to rise up and put an end to the twisted ideology that gives rise to such abomination.

When some alleged supporters of Palestine systematically, and by all means possible, insist to deprive us from exposing that rampant racism and supremacy amongst the Israeli-settler-society, they stab Palestine and the Palestinians in the back. For this could be one of our most powerful weapons that would expose and finally bring to an end the horrendous crimes committed by that colonial criminal entity.

All things considered, it appears that these people joined the Palestine Solidarity Movement for an agenda that does not truly correspond to, or entirely represents the hopes and aspirations of Palestinians.

For the sake of the Palestinian people at the brink of annihilation, the sake of a Holy Land almost fully destroyed by sociopathic foreign occupiers, it is not longer acceptable that boundaries of permissible political debate are defined and confined by people whose main concern is to minimise the damage of the occupier by tightening the bolts of debate and by evicting whomever keeps the clear and unalienable vision of Liberation and Justice as the irremediable way to Peace.

Stifling the debate and keeping the gates and minds shut, rather than engaging in honest exploration of FACTS, is a method ultimately beneficial to the Zionist project, and not to Palestine, not to Palestinians, and certainly not to the larger Peace in the Middle-East, since the promoters and fomenters of these endless wars are mainly to be found amidst Jewish-Zionist networks.

A solution involving rewarding criminals for their crimes, perpetuated for almost a century, can no longer be seen as a fair solution.

When the aim is noble, when the intention is honest and when goal is the pursuit of truth and justice; no amount of pressure, intimidation, manipulation or harm; psychological or otherwise will yield any fruit.

What is at stake is Palestine, and for Palestine no effort is too small and no sacrifice is too great.

Addendum:

This is the email that was sent to Gilad atzmon:

From nahida

to Gilad Atzmon

date 14 October 2011 19:21

I must clarify that I haven’t been kicked out from .FoP or PSC, but my article have been taken down from LFoP website.

Two years ago, I stopped participating in the activities (but I stayed a member) because some group members engaged in gossip, accusation and rumours against a member of my family ( who had innocently sent an article by Gilad Atzmon to a member of the local Jews for Peace and Justice -not knowing that Gilad was boycotted by .FoP since 2006)

The fact that I was accused of “racism” against the Jews, and those who accused me used lies and glaring misrepresentation of my views, and that .FoP agreed to take down my article, relying on those accusation, I could no longer be part of such organization.

A Second Addendum:

A striking confession comes from no other than the Former Director of National Affairs for the American Jewish Committee, one of the largest and most powerful Jewish organization in America Stephen Steinlight

“I’ll confess it, at least: like thousands of other typical Jewish kids of my generation, I was reared as a Jewish nationalist, even a quasi-separatist. Every summer for two months for 10 formative years during my childhood and adolescence I attended Jewish summer camp.

There, each morning, I saluted a foreign flag, dressed in a uniform reflecting its colors, sang a foreign national anthem, learned a foreign language, learned foreign folk songs and dances, and was taught that Israel was the true homeland.

Emigration to Israel was considered the highest virtue, and, like many other Jewish teens of my generation, I spent two summers working in Israel on a collective farm while I contemplated that possibility.
More tacitly and subconsciously, I was taught the superiority of my people to the gentiles who had oppressed us. We were taught to view non-Jews as untrustworthy outsiders, people from whom sudden gusts of hatred might be anticipated, people less sensitive, intelligent, and moral than ourselves. We were also taught that the lesson of our dark history is that we could rely on no one.”

Filed under: Articles | 4 Comments »

It is self evident, that:
“From scrutiny comes understanding, and from that understanding comes support or opposition, and both are necessary“~~~ J.F. Kennedy

And yet, we read that some prefer secrecy and devout acquiescence:
“Any open debate of this issue could be damaging,’ said a Jewish communal leader” Source

The above quote is taken from this article , which I strongly suggest to read. It was published in 2004 in The Forward (formerly Jewish Daily Forward) Magazine. It is an exposѐ of a mindset that dreads open discussions unless framed by its “expertise” within its own parameters. A mindset that cannot tolerate debate nor can it survive the light of truths. In order to fulfill its aims it has to block free exchange of information. A mindset that finds danger in every corner when working with transparency. It can only thrive in the dark where words are robbed of meanings, deeds are shrouded with secrecy and ideologies are hidden from scrutiny.

“Such a change would severely weaken the organization’s influence and fuel charges of dual loyalties against Jewish groups, communal observers said”

“For months, the federal probe was believed to center on allegations that Aipac officials might have illegally passed classified documents on to Israel, which they received from a Pentagon employee, Larry Franklin.”

“Although Aipac staffers are known to be exceedingly careful in their dealings with official representatives of Israel, so as not to violate the law, there have been incidents in the past in which Israeli officials gave directions to Aipac to act in one way or another, said former Aipac employees speaking on condition of anonymity.”

“Jewish activists say that even if the likelihood is low that a legal attempt to compel Aipac to register as a foreign agent will be successful, public focus on the issue could be damaging. “Any open debate of this issue could be damaging,” said a Jewish communal leader. “Questions of loyalty will resurface, and this time such questions will have to do with the chief pro-Israel lobby in America.”

The above article is only but one example that shows clearly that the deadliest enemy of Zionists is and has always been: open debate.

But who would fear open debate, unless facts pose threat to them?

Who would want to work in secrecy, unless transparency causes them harm and damage?

Scrurutinizing for example an organization such as Anti Defamation League, (ADL) exposes that one of it’s major roles (under the pretext of fighting anti-semitism) is to prevent open debate and block intellectual discussion about four main problems:

• The problem of the Ideology of Jewish Supremacism

• The problem of Global Jewish-Zionist Networking and Lobbying and their role

• The problem of idolizing the Holocaust (which is used as a tool to further Zionists aims)

• The problem of demanding independent investigation for truth of 9/11

It is justified to conclude that the doctrine of ADL consists of making accusations, framed as follows:

“Antisemite“:
Anyone who does not believe in the chosen-ness of the Jewish people, anyone who dares to criticise racist ideologies that leads to crimes committed by Jewish Zionists “Israelis” or anyone who feels troubled with the extent of influence of the Jewish Zionist … lobby.

“Holocaust denier“:
Anyone who does not believe in the uniqueness of the suffering and the eternal persecution of the Jewish people or who questions the misuse of Holocaust to achieve some gains.

Conspiracy Theorist
Anyone who doubts the government narrative about 9/11 and suspects “Israel” or Mossad involvement.

Why would some who claim to be “friends” of Palestine adopt such definitions?

Why would they adhere to, propagate and perpetuate dogmas that eviscerate words of their respective meanings, and then forge twisted concepts of reality?

Why would they follow the same medieval doctrine by attempting to prevent open discussion on vital issues such as the dubious and unethical … role and evident influence of global Jewish Zionist Networks?

Why would they use the same unethical methods of smearing to gag intellectuals and BLOCK debate?

Why would they excommunicate, slander and chase out of the solidarity movement, activists who call for free discussions to understand, scrutinize and expose the role of Jewish communities and their Networks in supporting a criminal entity?

In other words, why would they volunteer to do the work for ADL, BOD and AIPAC?

Trying to understand this phenomenon, I noticed that many Zionists and anti Zionists alike exhibit irrational yet deeply ingrained and extremely troubling understanding and distorted perception of certain concepts in relation with antisemitism:
It appears to me that many have firm conviction -that amounts to almost ideological belief, of the prevalent existence of:

• Global intrinsic unexplainable hatred of the Jews amongst gentiles;

• Permanent threat of annihilation of the Jews;

• Millennia-old perpetual unique Jewish suffering

Such beliefs have become major components that defines, bonds and shapes Jewish identity today.

In my view, these concepts (real or imagined) have morphed into creed. This perceived “intrinsic hatred against the Jews”, “eternal threat of annihilation” and the “unparalleled suffering” have formed an emotional blockage, a psychological wall that prevents many Jews from conducting a rational conversation or debate when faced with constructive and legitimate criticism related to Jewish ideology, to Jewish-Zionist networking or the Jewish community’s fervent and systematic support for “Israel”.

Such inability to take criticism, inevitably causes reactionary defense mechanisms translated as aggression against those anyone who genuinely desires to examine and understand the full picture, without prejudice, aiming to excavate the roots of problems and perhaps suggest comprehensive solutions.

Consequently, and under the pretext of respecting “Jewish sensitivities”, debates about the taboo problems don’t usually see the light, and if they do, they immediately and as a matter of urgency and non-negotiability, get aborted.

Many in the European West find themselves unable to examine such taboos because of many years of indoctrinations which makes them feel guilty even though they have never done anything to harm the Jews during the Nazi era or otherwise. Some avoid the discussion for fear of being labelled or smeared.

For a people like us from the Middle East, we do not carry the baggage of indoctrination of guilt nor do we have fear of being labelled. As for me, I simply trust both my sincerity and my love of all humanity. My approach to the topic is genuine, afresh with open-mindedness and pure intentions.

My conclusion is, if indeed we desire the eradication of antisemitism, such emotional blockage and irrational dogmas must to be addressed, in order to allow opening of hearts for the exchange of ideas and the flow of information that would facilitates open debate about what troubles both Jews and gentiles alike.

Jewish supporters need to understand that non-Jews also, have their own REAL fears and sensitivities;

We are extremely worried about the state of affairs we find our world we in today;

We are extremely worried about the REAL “Israeli” wars of aggression and destruction against other nations;

We are extremely worried about the REAL “Israeli” threats to other nations;

We are extremely worried about the role of the Jewish communities in supporting criminal “Israel” and its murderous army;

We are extremely worried about the level of influence and the Israelification exerted by some Jewish Zionist organizations and networks;

We are extremely worried about the heinous, abhorrent supremacist nihilistic ideology pervasive amongst some Orthodox Jewish groups and how this ideology crept inside the psyche of self-claimed “secular Jews” in the Zionist entity.

We are extremely worried about the military training, the Security involvement and the internet monitoring of some Jewish Zionists groups worldwide.

I hope that people who read my articles appreciate the sincerity and honesty in which I articulate my wake-up call, warning against an immanent danger that I see in the horizon if the ethical elements amidst Jews continue to ignore the troubling signs.

Rather, it’s the contrary; it is a wake up call, a sincere advice that’s intended to alert Jewish friends who embrace humanistic values to the necessity of exposing and opposing such reality in order not to be lumped with the aggressors when the tide is finally changed.

In my view, participating (actively or passively) in the cover up and concealment of the above is far more dangerous to the Jewish people as a whole and would more likely exacerbate anti-Semitism.

I said before and I reiterate, I believe that Judaism has long been hijacked by cabbalastic clique who managed to mislead a majority of world Jewry by propagating racist ideology amongst them. They also managed to entice them into supporting an inhumane criminal entity for several decades.

I, along with all humanists, hope to see ethical humanists Jews (even though a minority) who claim to be the true representatives of “Judaism” and “Jewish values” is to reclaim their “Judaism” and “Jewish values” back.

I would like to see ethical humanists Jews knocking at the doors of synagogues, community centres and Jewish Zionist organizations, aiming to re-educate their entire communities with authentic Judaism and with these “Jewish values” they proclaim.

I would like to see ethical humanists Jews retrieving the leading role in these misguided organizations and institutions, aiming to harness and neutralize the destructive force that took hold of their communities.

I would like to see ethical humanists Jews steering and redirecting the path that Jewish Zionists have embarked upon.

That would change the course of history, wouldn’t it!

Finally, I reiterate;
True friends of Palestine would NOT defend the rights of thieves, murderers and serial killers to remain on STOLEN Land.

True friends of Palestine would NOT defend racist ideology, by smearing those who expose it.

True friends of Palestine would NOT object to Palestinian aspiration of FULL Liberation.

True friends of Palestine would NOT divert the attention from the Real Criminals only to focus on a vague phantomic concept that can be dropped at any moment after achieving its goals.

True humanists and True Friends of Palestine would most certainly not shy away from speaking the TRUTH even when it hurts, and even against themselves and their own people.

I finish with this quote:

“The dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighs the dangers that are cited to justify it” ~~~ J.F. Kennedy
.

Filed under: Articles | 1 Comment »

Did you ever ponder about the question: Who is promoting America’s wars?

Who pushed for the war on Iraq?

Who is pushing for another war on Iran?

Who is promoting concepts of American Exceptionalism., military necessity, and “leadership with muscle”?

Who is indoctrinating American police and public with “educational” programmes of “Law Enforcement”?

Who is fomenting hatred against Islam and Muslims just to conceal their criminality by pretending to be the spearhead fighting the war against terror and extremism?

Who is offering courses in combating terrorism with their “superb anti-terror schools”?

Who is posing as the world leading authority in understanding and explaining “terror” related issues?

Who is supporting a pariah entity and promoting its interests despite all its violations of Human Rights and International Law?

Who are those who hold key positions in USA policy making and Homeland Security despite being advocates and supporters of a supremacist racist Jewish group?

Who is forcing us to go through radiating machines under the pretext of fighting terrorism while expanding and making a fortune in the process?

Who is fermenting by deception, all sorts of wars and conflicts yet deceivingly they pose as the protector of peace and security?

Who is honouring and celebrating murderers and baby killers?

To answer these questions, this might be a good place to start

Then have a look at this

And this

“For more than three decades, the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs has been a strong supporter and defender of America’s military might – and of America’s
long-standing friendship with Israel. I thank you all for your contribution to the debate
over our nation’s foreign policy.”
~ Robert M. Gates, Secretary of Defense

“[JINSA, the Jewish Institute for National Security] created a crucial forum that exists nowhere else that keeps our nation and its leaders focused on the threats, challenges and opportunities that we face from a combination of sworn enemies, emerging rivals and evolving alliances.”
~ Senator Joseph Lieberman

JINSA which claims to have 20,000 members and has a budget of about $4.000.000 is actively involved in promoting and justifying wars of aggression

Henry M. Jackson Foundation- HJF is yet but another organization linked to JINSA. It declares on it’s own website: “for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc. (HJF) is a global organization dedicated to advancing military medical research. We serve military, medical, academic and government clients by administering, managing and supporting preeminent scientific programs that benefit members of the armed forces and civilians alike.”

In their 2010 Annual Report, they describe themselves as a “Global Organization Driven by Singular Mission”

“Since its founding in 1983, HJF has dedicated itself to a clear and noble mission: advancing military medicine. Although much has changed in the ensuing 27 years, the Foundation’s commitment to its mission remains unchanged.”

• So, Who are the war mongers?

• The Insanity of the Iran Confrontation

• Press Release – JINSA Applauds Obama Admin. Turnaround on Iran

• Iran, Iran, Iran and Iran

• Policy Director Jim Colbert Quoted in Washington Jewish Week, 11/9/2011

• Iran Expert Berman Briefs JINSA on What’s Happening Inside Iran

• Confronting Iran Panel

• Matthew Gould, the Zionist-British Ambassador to Israel and the Plot to Attack Iran

“Does this lust for war and destruction has any ideological foundations?”, one is entitled to ask.

Lo and behold, with only a tiny scratch to the surface in search for answers, you are hit with this:

THE LAWS OF KINGS AND THEIR WARS

6) The obligation to destroy the seven nations living in the Land of Canaan;
7) The prohibition against allowing any one of them to remain alive;
8 ) The obligation to destroy the descendents of Amalek;
9) The obligation to remember what Amalek did;

“A king should not wage other wars before a milchemet mitzvah. What is considered as milchemet mitzvah? The war against the seven nations who occupied Eretz Yisrael, the war against Amalek, and a war fought to assist Israel from an enemy which attacks them.
Afterwards, he may wage a milchemet hareshut, (war of aggression) i.e. a war fought with other nations in order to expand the borders of Israel ormagnify its greatnessandreputation.”

“wars of conquest are permissible. As stated, these are wars against enemies that lie very far from Israel’s borders, and as such, are obviously not defensive wars but rather wars motivated by pure aggression.”

“….the justification for war is the Jewish people‘s exercising their divine right to the land of Canaan, “And you shall take possession of the land and settle in it for I have assigned the land to you to possess.”

“Rabbi Yehudah identifies wars of conquest and aggression as commanded (mitzvah) and the war against the seven nations as obligatory (chovah).”

Sadly, such ideology is not confined to being dusty theological scrolls kept in attics, or ancient theoretical books used as mythology. Such ideology has managed to produce its own horrific manifestation. It is real in every practical sense; seen, heard, smelled and touched as facts on the ground, and in the most ugly and reprehensible manner, as it poses as an “authority” in ethics slaughtering, maiming and stealing while “blessing” humanity with “Great” lessons in “morality”!

Adherents of such racist and anti-human ideology, while affirming in principle and in practice that wars of aggression are commanded, do not hesitate to agitate the whole world against one quarter of its populations, namely the Muslims. They flood the media with fabricated stories about the “immanent” Islamic “terror threat”. They spread the irrational hysteria of Islamophobia and “shari’a-phobia”. They keep people hostages, in a perpetual state of anxiety, hate and fear; shackled by the Hasbara-made psychological dungeons of ignorance and misinformation.

They accuse and attack the very book that clearly forbids wars of aggression: ‘You may fight in the cause of God against those who fight you, but DO NOT INITIATE AGGRESSION. God does not love transgressors.’ (2.190).
The book which clearly calls for justice even against oneself: “Ye who believe! Stand out firmly for justice, as witnesses to God, even as against yourselves, or your parents, or your kin, and whether it be (against) rich or poor: for God can best protect both. Follow not the desires (of your hearts) (4:135).
The book which unequivocally calls for justice even when dealing with aggressors:
“O ye who believe! be steadfast firmly for God, as witnesses to fair dealing, Let NOT a group’s hostility to you cause you to deviate from JUSTICE. Be JUST, for it is closer to piety. Be God conscious; for God is Well Aware of what you do.” (5-8 ).

Knowing all this, Are We Justified to ask questions and search for answers?

Knowing all this, would any true friend of Palestine, would any sane or moral person, want to see the Palestinians forced or coerced to live with such heartless warmongers?

True friends of Palestine would NOT defend the rights of thieves, murderers and serial killers to remain on STOLEN Land.

True friends of Palestine would NOT defend racist ideology, by smearing those who expose it.

True friends of Palestine would NOT object to Palestinian aspiration of FULL Liberation.

True friends of Palestine would NOT divert the attention from the Real Criminals only to focus on a vague phantomic concept that can be dropped at any moment after achieving its goals.

True Humanists and True Friends of Palestine would most certainly not shy away from speaking the TRUTH even when it hurts, and even against their own people.
.

Filed under: Articles | Leave a comment »