I hoped, I prayed, I implored….to find a spark of
humanity… within themselves …..They didn’t.

Israeli High Court of Justice against Bassam Aramin

http://www.creative-i.info/?p=10966

14 October, 2009

The
court does not sympathize

Nurit Peled Elhanan

On Wednesday we – members of the Combatants for Peace movement, women of
Mahsom [Heb. checkpoint] Watch, members of the Forum of Bereaved Families for
Peace and writer David Grossman – attended a hearing at the High Court of
Justice on the matter of the closing, due to lack of evidence, of the
investigatory file on the killing of ten-year-old Abir Aramin about three years
ago.

The hearing, which had been scheduled for eleven
o’clock and then for nine o’clock
and then for ten o’clock and then for
one o’clock, began at two.
Journalists ran to and fro in the corridor (Who died? A little girl? Really?
Excuse me, sir, did your daughter die? Yes. Then you are Bassam Aramin? No, I
am Rami Elhanan. Oh, sorry. So where’s that Aramin? And who are you? We are
from Mahsom Watch. From what checkpoint? What are you doing here? And who are
you? I am a friend. Of those Palestinians? Yes. How come? How can it be? Can I
interview you? Did you too have a daughter who died? Really? When? How? What
was her name? And after all that you are on their side?) But at the end of the
day no Israeli reported on what happened.

Salwa and Bassam Aramin are not Jews and they are
not Israelis. They live under a cruel occupation and they have experienced all
it has to offer: exile, imprisonment and the killing of their small daughter
Abir by a rubber bullet that was allegedly fired from the rifle of a Border
Guard soldier who was sitting in an armoured jeep and thrust the barrel of his
rifle through the opening that was allegedly designed for that purpose and
allegedly aimed and fired at the head of the girl who was standing beside her
sister at a kiosk, allegedly buying candy during the break between the first
class and the second. The projectile was removed from under the girl’s body and
transferred to the authorities. The eyewitnesses, as well as the Border Guard
soldiers, testified that there was no alleged danger to their lives and that
the shooting was done – if it was done – in contravention of instructions. Two
pathologists testified that it was probable that the fracture in Abir’s little
skull could allegedly have been caused by a rubber bullet. The attending physician
at the Hadassah hospital said that it was not a live bullet. The video of the
reconstruction of the incident was not given to the defence counsel or to the
court, because the soldiers who allegedly carried out the shooting, that is,
who thrust the barrel of the rifle through the opening that had been made
especially for that purpose, aimed and fired at the head of the girl Abir, were
featured in the recording.

Counsel for the State, stammering, unprepared and unkempt, stood like a
platoon commander in charge of new recruits with her back to the public and
refuted the allegations: So they found a projectile. So what? Who knows how
long it had been lying there? So people gave testimony, so what? They (those
Arabs) can say anything, does that make it testimony? So nobody was throwing
stones at that spot, so what? On a nearby street stones were thrown. If you
were in my place, she laughingly says to Michael Sfard, Aramin’s attorney, you
would have made morsels of them by now.

Morsels

Judge Beinish reminds Sfard – twice – that there have been such incidents in
the past and that soldiers have rarely been put on trial or even indicted, so
it would be best to just forget it. The State Counsel, with a laugh: I had the
pleasure of attending such trials.

Morsels. Pleasure.

But Salwa and Bassam Aramin have no choice but to seek justice in an Israeli
court. They demand that the truth come to light in a court of the occupiers –
of the killers. “So that I can rest and so that Abir can rest,” Salwa says to
the journalists. The perfect crime, Jean-François Lyotard once wrote, is not
only the killing but also the suppression of the testimony and the silencing of
the voices of the victims. And the greatest injustice is to compel the victims
to seek justice in the court of their tormentors.

As Judge Beinish implied in her comments to Sfard, the blood of Palestinians
is cheap in this country. No one has ever been punished for killing
Palestinians – children, adults, newborns, old people. The Jewish murderers are
all walking among us, free and happy.

Those who have murdered our Israeli children, the Palestinian suicide
bombers, have at least said “let me die with the Philistines”* and spared us
any questions about their presence in the world. The murderer of Abir Aramin no
doubt spent that very evening in a bar (Shit! What a nasty day! A little girl
walked right into my crosshairs!), and will continue to spend many more
evenings in many more bars, while Abir’s parents seek justice from the
occupier, from the oppressor.

My 17-year-old son Yigal sat in the courtroom all day with a shocked
expression on his face. That night he took off for Auschwitz
with his classmates.

For his sake I hoped, I prayed, I implored, I nearly shouted for the drowsy
judges – Beinish, Arbel, Frocaccia – to find a spark of humanity, of motherly
feelings, within themselves and to look into the eyes of Salwa, who never
stopped crying, and at Bassam’s ashen face, and to say: the High Court of
Justice sympathizes with you over the death of little Abir. They didn’t.

It wasn’t a Muslim

http://www.takeourworldback.com/itwasntmuslims.htm

It wasn’t Muslims who, on
Tuesday, October 2 through Friday, October 5, 2001: 1) met with, and 2)
received $3 million in gifts for "funds for victims" from
Sheikh Hamad bin
Khalifah Al-Thani, the
Emir of Qatar
who started the Al Jazeera
channel in 1996 with a $150 million grant,
the channel
which broadcasts audios and videos purporting to be of "Osama
bin Laden" aka
Emmanuel
Goldstein; it was: 1)

George W. Bush, Dick

Cheney (an "old friend") – Cheney also
met
the Emir on October 20, 2001 to discuss the "Osama" interviews, Rudy
Giuliani,
Colin Powell, Paul Wolfowitz, and Richard Myers 2)

Rudy Giuliani, Paul
Wolfowitz
and Richard Myers.

It wasn’t Muslims who
fabricated a fairy
story about Pfc.
Jessica Lynch being ambushed, stabbed, shot, bravely continuing to shoot
Iraqis, being abused,
raped,
and held captive in a hospital by Iraqi guards, and later rescued by elite US
forces; it was "unnamed US
officials" who

lied, since in fact there was no "rescue", Lynch’s

gun had jammed with sand,
she
was being cared for by the Iraqis after being injured in a car crash, she
had no "bullet holes" or "knife wounds", the hospital was not "under guard", and
doctors had even tried to return Lynch to US forces themselves. 

It wasn’t Muslims who

conspired to invade a defenseless nation by
lying
about "weapons of mass destruction"
("WMDs") when they had
already made
up their minds to invade for "regime change", resulting in excess Iraqi
deaths estimated at

655,000 to

one million, the displacement of
more than four million, the
sacrifice of thousands of
troops and throwing away of

$3 trillion to no avail save for
enriching a few
war criminals and

profiteers to the tune of
billions of
dollars in this
proxy war
for Israel;
it was George W. Bush
and Tony Blair.

It wasn’t a Muslim who ordered aides to plan for striking Iraq

barely five hours after the Pentagon was attacked on 9/11; it was

Donald Rumsfeld.

It wasn’t Muslims who ordered
250 police to smash their
way into a house in Forest Gate, London, in the middle of the night and
arrest two brothers after shooting one of them in the shoulder, on the basis of
intelligence said to be from a "reliable", single source regarding a conspiracy
involving a "cyanide bomb", with the brothers being released without charge
several days later before it was subsequently revealed that the source was
a man with
an IQ of 69 who was already in jail on a terror conviction; it was Jewish
supremacist lackeys
MI5,
Tony Blair and John Reid.

It isn’t Muslim countries that
have
hundreds of nuclear warheads and
submarines equipped with cruise missiles capable of carrying nuclear warheads with a 900-mile range;
it is Israel.

It isn’t Muslims that have a powerful political lobby capable of extorting vast sums;
it is Israel.

It wasn’t a Muslim who boasted "We Muslims control America, and the Americans
know it";
it was
Ariel Sharon who boasted "We, the Jewish people, control America, and the
Americans know it".

It isn’t Muslims who fake phony "hate crimes" against themselves, such as
vandalising their
own cars or
graves, or
poisoning their dogs
and defacing their houses with swastikas, or
cutting their clothes
and drawing swastikas on their stomachs; it is Jews.

It wasn’t Muslims who took
control of The New York Times in 1896, or who indeed
own and
control much of the mainstream media today; it was and is Jews.

It isn’t a Muslim country that crushes peace protesters to death with bulldozers or shoots them, or
shells a picnicking family on a beach
(and then

refuses to own up) when it wants to launch a war within
the next three
weeks, or warns civilians to flee after blowing up bridges so it can target them like sitting ducks, or shoots at Red Cross ambulances or UN observers after promising they would be safe,
or bombs a power station so that
more than ten
thousand tonnes of crude oil leaks into the Mediterranean as a "collective
punishment";
it is Israel.

It isn’t Muslims who
routinely employ
weapons such as phosphorus shells to inflict
grave and
horrific injuries on
civilians, and who
deliberately fire more than a
million cluster bomblets of which 40% fail to detonate on impact and

90% are employed in the final three days before a ceasefire so they can "get
them all in while the going is good"; it is Israel.

It isn’t a Muslim nation that holds the world record for

defying UN resolutions; it is
Israel.

It wasn’t Muslims who ganged up on a handicapped Jew for hiking on his own
land, beat him with clubs, dragged him along the ground, tied him to a power
pole and continued to beat and kick him as Muslim soldiers did nothing to stop
it and police merely advised the thugs to pour water on the victim’s head to
wash away the blood before journalists and  photographers arrived; it was a gang
of

four cowardly, bigoted Jewish settlers who beat up a handicapped Palestinian
with impunity, basking in the knowledge that Jewish soldiers and police would
not act impartially, and even
returning a week
later to torment the neighbors, ransacking their home and destroying their
few possessions.

It wasn’t Muslim soldiers who beat up and killed a Jew with clubs and rifle
butts and kicks to the head and then, after an ‘investigation’, concluded that
the soldiers had "acted properly"; it was
the Israeli "Defense"
Forces who smashed three holes in a Palestinian teenager’s skull killing him
as he merely waited at a bus stop, continuing to beat him as he lay unconscious,
then made up a story about him "pulling a knife" and suggested that he was
"mentally unstable" in a case that is sadly

all too typical of violence perpetrated by racist, bigoted right-wing
extremist

Jewish supremacists upon those whom they perceive as "animals
in human form".

It wasn’t Muslims who created a global organization named the "Anti
Defamation League" in order to defend Muslim criminals by playing the race card
and accusing their pursuers of being "racists" and "anti-Semites"
who were guilty of "hate crimes"; it
was Jews who set up the Anti Defamation League of B’nai B’rith in response to
the lynching of
Leo Frank, president of the Atlanta chapter of the B’nai B’rith Jewish
secret society who had been convicted of murdering 13-year-old Mary Phagan who
worked at Frank’s pencil factory, with the lynching of Frank being in response
to the commuting of his death sentence to life imprisonment after organized
Jewry had tried to cast doubt on Frank’s conviction by shifting the blame to a
black man even though ritual
murder is a known
Jewish tradition, the ADL being used thereafter to denounce anti-criminals as "anti-Semites"
whenever

the criminals happened to be Jews.

It isn’t Muslims who, for political and financial gain,
demolished the
World Trade Center with

nano-thermite and crashed
remote-controlled planes into it in order to set up a hoax about "Jewish
kamikaze pilots" and then attempt to throw researchers off the scent by
pretending to "investigate" the demolitions whilst ‘accidentally’ plumping for
the

wrong hypothesis (e.g. H-bombs rather than thermite), and then stubbornly
refuse to change to a hypothesis that is
in
accordance with the evidence; it is
Jews who set up a hoax about "Muslim
kamikaze pilots" and have their deliberately misleading ‘work‘
about the demolitions hosted at sites that are

owned and edited
by

Jews.

It wasn’t Muslims who practised pseudo-science by

refusing to look for Iron Blue at Auschwitz or
explosives at the World Trade Center,
in order that their ‘investigation’ would come up with the required financially
and politically motivated result; it was

Jan Markiewicz, Wojciech Gubala, and Jerzy Labedz of the Jan Sehn Institute at
Krakow (Auschwitz fraud), and

"scientists" and "engineers" at

NIST (WTC fraud).

It wasn’t Muslims who took over the "investigation" of the World Trade Center
collapses when FEMA were

making a hash of the cover up,

mixed up Figures 11-51 and 11-52 in NCSTAR1-9Vol2 on their WTC7 report which
was published two days after the mysterious death of eyewitness
Barry
Jennings whose testimony of explosions
in WTC7 before either Tower had collapsed  – note he specifically says
(4:43) "I
was trapped in there when both buildings came down" –
blew their politically motivated
assumptions and conclusions apart, failed to spot their mistake in their
accompanying description,

assumed unrealistically high gas temperatures in order to derive their
required unrealistically high steel temperatures, published a preposterous
hypothesis
of a "thermal-expansion"-based collapse with the logical conclusion that the
180
kip shear capacity of four bolts in a seated connection would be exceeded if the
steel heated up from
20 C to 32 C making the force to completely resist the
thermal expansion
191 kip,
irrespective of the fact that no steel-framed high-rises had ever collapsed due to
"fires" or "impacts" apart from the three that allegedly did so on 9/11, claimed inward bowing of the WTC1 perimeter columns
between floors 94 to 100
peaking at 55 inches at column 316 on the 96th floor
which could not be reconciled with the fact that
the columns’ moment of inertia
or second moment of area was
at least 342 ins^4 along
the minor axis and a
maximum deflection of 55 inches given fixed – fixed boundary conditions and a
distributed load would have required the failure within 102 minutes of
at least
ten consecutive floors, many of which did not have any fireproofing ‘dislodged’
by a plane and did not even experience substantial fires; it was NIST, whose top
scientists and engineers have

extensive knowledge of nano-thermites, but said
they had found "no evidence" of explosives at the WTC and later
admitted that
they had not bothered to look for any. The 9/11 perpetrators had to ensure
those in charge of the "investigation" were aware of that which they must not
find.

It wasn’t a Muslim who announced on Sunday September 16, 2001 that a
"hijacker’s passport" (allegedly that of Satam al Suqami) had been found
"several
blocks from the ruins of the World Trade Center", with other reports asserting that the passport was
found "in the vicinity of Vesey Street"; it was former Police Commissioner
Bernard Kerik who was indicted November 2007 on multiple counts including lying,
fraud and conspiracy, which is consistent with the fact that the laws of
aerodynamics dictate that
the passport should have been found in the vicinity of
Liberty Street, the scriptwriter forgot that Suqami was supposed to be on
Flight AA11
approaching from the north, and, of several attempts made by the authorities to
guess where the passport should have been found, not one of them was correct!

It wasn’t Muslims who had JFK killed;
it was
Jews.

It wasn’t Muslims who stole elections by exploiting electronic voting
machines that biased the results such that the odds for several swing states to
swing as much as they did from the exit polls was

250 million to one against; it was George W. Bush.

It isn’t Muslims who exhibit traits of supremacist megalomaniacs by referring to their enemies as

"grasshoppers", "beasts", "crocodiles" and "cockroaches"; it
is Jews. 

It wasn’t a Muslim who set up

a Ponzi scheme that netted $50 billion; it was

a Jew.

It

wasn’t Muslims who made a record about doing "The
Wall Street Shuffle" and whose other songs
included scatological references; it was Jews.

It isn’t Muslims who
rule the world by
proxy and get others to fight and die for them in wars; it is Jews, whose
modus operandi is to

select rich host populations that will let them in, pose as their "ally"
whilst draining them of
hard-earned wealth, employ
deception to
trick the hosts into fighting poorer nations, and reap
the spoils
of war such as
Afghan opium
trafficking,
missing Pentagon funds,
looting of
oil-for-food funds, etc, along with other opportunistic scams such as the
$550
billion electronic run on the banks. Note: some reports incorrectly state
Thursday September "15", 2008 for the latter; it should of course be September
11, the Thursday prior to September 15.

It isn’t Muslims who have been
expelled from countries on
numerous occasions, it is Jews who
keep getting kicked out as
soon as the host gets wise to the fact that Jews’ only loyalty is
to their own
tribe, rather than the host nation to whom Jews pose as an "ally". 

It wasn’t Muslims who started a World War in 1914 in the hope that they could
successfully launch a hoax about "six
million" of their number being killed in order to obtain
their own
country and net a substantial fraction of global wealth in "reparations",
failed, but also exploited the opportunity to
annex and loot Russia
and indulge in horrific
blood-letting and oppression as a means of settling old scores with

the Rus who had chased them westwards from former Khazaria; it was
Khazar (fake) ‘Jews’.

It wasn’t Muslims who
blew up Francois
Duprat’s car killing him and maiming his wife, beat up
Dr. Robert
Faurisson at least
ten
times in which his jaw was broken / teeth knocked out /
nearly killed
several times / hospitalized for weeks and was persecuted in legal battles and
had his home raided by police, tried to kill Ernst Zundel on at least three occasions in

arson and

pipe bomb attacks and had
him and
Germar Rudolf
deported to
Germany and
jailed for
years, beat
Jurgen
Rieger unconscious and blew up his car, beat up

David Cole and threatened to kill him and his family, persecuted and
beat
Joseph Burg, attacked
Frank Walus
seven times and nearly killed him in an acid attack,
forced Ivan Lagace to
resign from his job as a crematory expert after endless threats from
thugs claiming to be from the Jewish
Defense League,
perpetrated numerous terrorist attacks in France including sulfuric acid sprayed into
faces / attacks with iron bars / baseball bats / gas sprayed / excrement strewn
around, had
historian David Irving spend 400 days in jail before being released on
Appeal from

a three year sentence which was for two speeches and a newspaper interview he
gave 16 years earlier, had Dr. Frederick Toben
jailed in Germany for ten
months for using his Australian website to express his views, and who had dozens more
jailed,
fined, and financially ruined by
character assassination and
legal battles; it was
Jews
attempting to prop up their idiosyncratic brand of "truth" which
profited them
handsomely for decades.

It wasn’t Muslims who fabricated
a hoax about "six
million" of their people being "murdered" involving an
evidence-free
conspiracy theory about a plot to exterminate them in "gas
chambers" which netted them – by way of
a huge,
illegitimate land grab – their own sovereign state, colossal profits in "reparations",
hundreds of billions of dollars in
foreign "aid" and
"loan guarantees" and
waiving /
subsidizing of interest payments, etc, and now
serves as their
"sword and shield" to practice
apartheid and kill
and oppress
their enemies with impunity; it was
Jews.

It wasn’t Muslims who were
caught
red-handed forging fake "smoke" onto wartime photographs of Auschwitz; it
was the Simon
Wiesenthal Center, whose

suitability as guardians of truth is comparable to a choice of Count Dracula
as a maintainer of blood banks.

It

isn’t Muslim mathematics that holds that the sum of a set of variables a + b
+ c + d + e… remains constant, e.g. at "six
million", when several variables fluctuate downwards by, say,

nearly three million and

about half of that, in the absence of any corresponding upwards revision; it is
financially and
politically motivated Jewish
"mathematics".

It isn’t Muslim physics and chemistry that holds that corpses may be
rapidly and economically cremated
with
between a pound and a kilogram of coke per body when the firebricks of the
cremation ovens are
not even replaced after some 20,000 cremations
(which is rather like expecting a

Trabant to be capable of doing 100,000 miles non-stop at 100 mph on 100
gallons of gasoline and a couple of cans of motor oil); it is
politically and
financially motivated Jewish "physics" and Jewish "chemistry".

It wasn’t Muslims – or even the "Russian
police" – who behave as if they authored
The Protocols of the
Learned Elders of Zion; it is
International Jewry,
and if it hisses like a snake and

rattles like a rattlesnake, it isn’t
exactly benign.

It is not the "international Muslim" who has much to answer for; it is
the international Jew.

The mainstream media’s conspicuous silence over the
collapse of
the official
9/11 conspiracy theory has clearly exposed them as "the dogs that didn’t bark".

It wasn’t a Muslim

http://www.takeourworldback.com/itwasntmuslims.htm

With
a peer-reviewed scientific journal having published "loaded gun" (i.e.
unreacted nano-thermite) evidence finally proving beyond doubt that World
Trade Center Buildings 1, 2 and 7 were brought down in a series of controlled
demolitions, here are a few more facts to consider.

It wasn’t

Muslims in an Afghan cave who had access to
highly energetic nano-thermites;
it was the US
military and government scientists such as

those connected with NIST.

It wasn’t Muslims who ran a
construction company that was

awarded a $124 million contract for construction of the Naval Sea Systems
Command (NAVSEA) headquarters in
Washington, DC, which
oversees
the

Indian Head Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWC-IH), which was described
during the 1990s as the "National
Center for Energetics", the

military’s term for "explosives work", and as of 1999-2000 the "only
reliable source of aluminum nanopowders in the United States"; it was
Tom Leppert who was
CEO of
Turner Construction as

of 9/11/01, and who

even writes parts of Presidential speeches.

It wasn’t Muslims who ran a
construction company that had

supervised the 2000 demolition of the Seattle Kingdome, participated in the
post
9/11 collection and disposal of the steel wreckage of the WTC towers, and
carried out extensive renovations throughout the World Trade Center complex
right up to the morning of 9/11 including
fireproofing
upgrades on
the
floors that
were
struck by planes and subsequently "failed", when
the
steel had already been certified to
ASTM E119 by Universal Laboratories, and,
in tests
sponsored by NIST on corresponding floor assemblies subjected to
greater
heat exposure and protected with less fireproofing than

was the case at the WTC, the test specimens "were
able to sustain the maximum design load" without collapsing for as long as
the tests were run (2 to 3 1/2 hours); it was Tom
Leppert who was
CEO of
Turner Construction as

of 9/11/01 and
received a Torch of Conscience award from the
American Jewish
Congress.

It wasn’t Muslims who
trained their
cameras on the World Trade Center Towers prior to the first aircraft impact,
who danced and
celebrated
with high fives
prior to the
second impact as most onlookers still believed it had been a terrible accident
rather than terrorism, and who were caught with
foreign passports,
$4,700 in cash hidden in a sock,
maps
highlighting certain places in the city, and a van that tested positive for
traces of explosives; it was

Israelis Sivan Kurzberg, Paul Kurzberg, Yaron Shmuel, Oded Ellner, and Omer
Marmari, several of whom have been
confirmed
as Mossad agents, as part of their job in "documenting
the event".

It wasn’t Muslims who were caught on 9/11/01

operating in teams with
vans full of explosives, including one team who

attempted to blow up the

George Washington Bridge with a
truck packed
with tons of explosives, and another who

blew up a van between 6th and 7th on King Street with a mural painted

of a remote controlled airplane diving into New York and blowing up; it was
Israelis,
which is why the authorities did their best to

ignore and bury these reports which included a

suspected van bomb driven into the WTC basement and exploded to weaken the
structure.

It wasn’t Muslims who were caught shortly after midnight on May 7, 2002 very
close to the

Whidbey Island Naval Air Station, Oak Harbor, Wash., (where the Navy
conducts explosive
ordnance training for
bomb
disposal mobile units to the consternation of local marine life)
with a rental truck
that tested positive for TNT and RDX plastic explosives; it was
Israelis whose
cover story was of "delivering furniture" but regarded by authorities as dubious
because of the early morning hour, and the authorities’ subsequent claim that
the dog’s reaction and initial tests for explosives were wrong is

so full of holes that it merely demonstrates

the power of the Israeli lobby.

It wasn’t Muslims who were
in New
York on 9/11 and

in London on the morning of the 7/7 attacks; it was

Benjamin Netanyahu and
Rudy Giuliani.

It wasn’t Muslims who received advance warning of the London 7/7 attacks; it
was

Benjamin Netanyahu and
the Mossad.

It wasn’t Muslims who provided
two hours’ advance
warning of an attack on the World Trade Center via an instant messaging
company based in Herzliya; it was
Israelis.

It wasn’t a Muslim who
fled the US on
September 14, 2001; it was Dominick Suter of "Urban
Moving Systems" who
fled to
Israel.

It wasn’t

over a hundred Muslims who, from around

January 2000 to September 2001, posed as "art students"
and attempted to penetrate US Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) offices and other
federal buildings including
36 sensitive
Department of Defense (DoD) sites, were caught with diagrams of the interior
of federal buildings and photographs of federal agents and often evaded security
by entering through back doors or parking garages, and even

visited the homes of senior federal officials but not those of their
neighbors; it was
Israelis, none of whom were "art students" but many of whom had backgrounds
in Israeli military intelligence. Not surprisingly, the Press went for a limited
hangout by trying to pretend the Israelis were merely shadowing "Arab hijackers"
and either failed to pass on information, or "it
was not treated seriously", the old canard about "intelligence
failure". The operations of the Israeli fake "art students" is

well documented, including plenty of names and even descriptions. An
unusually large number of these Israelis were located in Irving, Dallas, TX
(p.23, previous link), which is

about ten miles west of
Tom
Leppert’s Alva Court home, which is
barely more than a mile north of the
Dallas home that George W. Bush moved into after leaving office.

It isn’t Muslim countries that have a massive
spy ring in the USA
capable of tapping
into much of the telecoms network and using information obtained to blackmail Americans;
it is
Israel.

It wasn’t Muslims who received advance warning on Monday September 10, 2001,
against flying the next day; it was San Francisco Mayor
Willie Brown,
and a group of

top Pentagon officials.

It wasn’t Muslims who
acquired a
99-year lease on the World Trade Center’s
Twin Towers, Buildings Four and
Five and approximately 400,000 square feet of retail space, and insured for billions of dollars against terror attacks a mere six weeks before terror attacks did in fact occur,
and then employed (to press for the insurance claim) a ‘structural engineer‘ who
misleadingly
asserts that
steel loses half its strength at "400 degrees";
it was
– in a deal negotiated by

Lewis Eisenberg of the Port Authority –

Benjamin Netanyahu’s (and Ariel Sharon’s and Ehud Barak’s) friend Larry
Silverstein and his partner
Australian billionaire and "Holocaust survivor"
Frank Lowy
who fought "in the
Jewish underground", was embroiled in a high-level bank corruption
scandal with Israeli Premier

Ehud Olmert and found to be
making
payments to Lord (Michael Abraham) Levy who was
arrested several
times in relation to a "cash for honors" scandal, Levy being a "tennis
partner" and advisor of
Tony Blair.

It isn’t Muslims who have a reputation for

perpetrating arson scams in order to claim off insurance companies as
evidenced by any colloquial use of the term "Muslim lightning"; it is Jews as
evidenced by the recognized term "Jewish
lightning".

It wasn’t Muslims who normally breakfasted at
the Windows on the
World restaurant on the 106th and 107th floors of the North Tower, but by
some bizarre coincidence did not happen to be there on 9/11 and were thus spared
the fate of occupants on that tragic day (none
of whom escaped from the floors above the aircraft impact at 8:46 AM); it
was Larry Silverstein who was

spared due to having a "dermatologist’s appointment", an event
which also spared his two
children who worked at Silverstein Properties.

It wasn’t a Muslim who
went on TV within hours of the attacks
to tell everyone that "It… certainly has the fingerprints of somebody like bin
Laden" and the World Trade Center had collapsed because of "the velocity of the
plane" and "intense heat probably weakened the structure as well", and who
reportedly on that very day advised the White House to take Cipro, an effective antibiotic
against anthrax,
seven days before the commencement of an anthrax letters terror
campaign targeted at

Democratic U.S. Senators and

news media offices, who
on 9/11/01 was
a managing director of the crisis and consequence management group at Kroll Associates, who

was an advisor to the Council of Foreign Relations (CFR) regarding
"epidemiological surveillance" and
national security advisor at
the National Institute of Health (NIH), and who
gave his ‘friend’
John O’Neill a job as Head Of Security at the World Trade Center; it was
Jerome Hauer.

It wasn’t Muslims who carried out a terror campaign mailing
letters containing anthrax spores
that had their electrostatic charge altered so that they would disperse more
readily, anthrax that

was traced to the weapons grade Ames strain originating at the US Army Medical
Research Institute for Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID)
at Fort Detrick,
neither was it the FBI’s
final "suspect"
Roman Catholic Bruce
Ivins, who, unlike the true perpetrators of the 9/11 attacks, had no motive
to target news media and Opposition Senators and thereby scare them into
uncritical acceptance of the "Arab hijackers" conspiracy theory. Ivins died of

an overdose and alleged "suicide" in July 2008 after the FBI gave up
attempting to pin the blame on Steven Hatfill because
there was
not a scintilla of evidence against him; a
logical suspect is Philip M. Zack
who left Fort Detrick under a cloud in December 1991 after having headed
a clique
calling itself the "Camel Club" that was racially harassing Egyptian-born Dr.
Ayaad Assaad. Zack was found by a 1992 inquiry to have been
caught
on surveillance camera being let into a Fort Detrick lab building at 8:40 p.m.
on Jan. 23, 1992 apparently by Dr. Marian Rippy, a lab pathologist and close
friend of Zack. The inquiry also found someone had been in a lab late at
night secretly conducting unauthorised research, evidently on anthrax believed
to include the Ames strain. Nearly ten years on, during the week between 9/11
and the commencement of the anthrax campaign,
the FBI received an
anonymous letter attempting to frame Dr. Assaad as a "bioterrorist".
The
anthrax letters seemed

contrived so as to appear to have been written by a Muslim, and
a New York Times writer told of
a "Mr. Z." who
failed some FBI polygraph tests and was once caught with a girlfriend at Fort Detrick "surrounded only by blushing germs".

It wasn’t a Muslim who was claimed to have been killed on the alleged
American Airlines "Flight 77", to have

lived at Silver Spring, Maryland (as did

a certain Rabbi Dr.
Dov
Zakheim), and to have worked on top-secret "deep-black"
projects at the

Indian Head Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWC-IH), a "renowned
leader in energetics" which operates an "Energetics Manufacturing Technology
Center", carries out "advanced
research in energetic systems" and "absorbed the function of the closed

Naval Ordnance Laboratory, formerly in White Oak, MD" which is a couple
miles from Silver Spring; it was

William E. Caswell.

It wasn’t Muslims who were claimed to have been killed on the alleged "Flight
77" and who worked for government or defense, particularly the Navy; it was

John Yamnicky who, strangely, for the first time
did not tell his
daughter that he was going on travel, and who, like

William Caswell, had worked for the Navy on top-secret "black" projects.
Others included

Charles Burlingame, a former Navy fighter pilot who used to work in the
section of the Pentagon that was hit and who had formulated a response for the
eventuality of an airliner being flown into the Pentagon and whose daughter
Wendy subsequently died in a "suspicious
fire" at a 50-story high-rise in New Jersey in December 2006,

Wilson "Bud" Flagg, a retired American Airlines pilot and Navy Admiral,

Stanley Hall, an expert in anti-radar technology and a director of program management at Raytheon,

Bryan Jack, a senior executive and top budget analyst who worked at the
Pentagon,

Chandler Keller, a Boeing propulsion engineer,
Dong
Lee, a Boeing engineer who worked for their Integrated Defense Systems and
who had worked for the National Security Agency (NSA) for 14 years,

Barbara Olson, CNN commentator and wife of the US Solicitor General who
claimed to have received cell phone calls from "Flight 77",

Ruben Ornedo, a Boeing propulsion / satellite communications engineer,

Robert Penniger, an electrical engineer with BAE Systems, and another dozen
alleged "Flight 77 passengers" who were linked to defense and government who, we
are told, all just
happened to be on this
unusually low
occupancy flight. These people, well loved and
respected as honest, decent heroes, are the very sort of characters whose
work could have been horrifically exploited without their knowledge, and whom
the 9/11 perpetrators would need to eliminate to prevent them speaking out after
the attacks.

It wasn’t Muslims who profited by
speculating on airline and
insurance stocks in advance of 9/11; it was Israelis.

It wasn’t Muslims who concocted a hoax about
pork-swilling,
money-eschewing,

celibate, truthful,
courageous,
pro-animal rights,
"devout Jews" who were "suicide hijackers / pilots",
almost
half of whom later turned up
alive and
well; it was Jews who concocted a hoax about
drinking,
gambling,

strip joint-frequenting,
womanizing, "devout Muslims"
who were "suicide hijackers / pilots",

almost half of whom later turned up
alive and well.

It wasn’t a Muslim who was a former unit team leader in an elite special forces unit
and whose father was a senior aide, secretary and pallbearer to a man who in 1937 was commander of the Irgun Tzvai Leumi, a
Jewish terrorist organization responsible for atrocities such as the King David Hotel bombing;
it was

Benjamin Netanyahu.

It wasn’t a Muslim who was the mentor of Benjamin Netanyahu’s
father Benzion and who wrote a
column in the Revisionist Zionist magazine Doar Hayom under the title
"From the Notebook of a Fascist",
praising Mussolini and referring to
one-time commander of the Irgun

Ze’ev (Vladimir) Jabotinsky as "our Duce";
it was Abba Ahimeir the
founder of
Revisionist Maximalism, a Jewish fascist ideology.

It wasn’t Muslim
terrorists who plotted to assassinate British foreign secretary Ernest Bevin;
it was

Jewish terrorists.

It wasn’t Muslims who orchestrated, and whose operatives were
caught red-handed
in, a failed false-flag terrorist
campaign in Egypt; it was

Israel.

It wasn’t Muslims who
attacked the USS Liberty
killing 34 Americans, and had the US President saying "I
don’t give a damn if every man drowns and the ship sinks. I don’t want to
embarrass our allies"; it was
Israel.

It wasn’t Muslims who were
evacuated
"apparently due to a specific security threat" in advance of the Amman, Jordan terror
attacks on
November 9, 2005 (9/11 by Israeli and European calendars), which
included a blast at the Radisson hotel
that was known to have emanated from a
bomb hidden in a false ceiling, even though the official story held that
it was really the work of "suicide bombers" and
therefore by some
bizarre coincidence the ceiling bomb must have been placed there previously by someone
else; it
was Israelis who were evacuated in advance of these attacks in which
there
were no Jewish casualties, most of the dead were Jordanian Sunni Muslims, two
Israeli casualties were both Arabs, and five Palestinians died including
Major-General Bashir Nafeh, the head of military intelligence in the West Bank.

It wasn’t Muslims who were
caught and arrested
inside the Mexican Congress chamber on October 10, 2001 in possession of
guns, grenades, dynamite, detonators and wiring while posing as "press
photographers"; it was
Mossad agent
Salvador Guersson Smecke and Israeli illegal immigrant Saur Ben Zvi at the
very time that Zionists would obtain maximum benefit from a false-flag terror
attack that would mobilize support for the war on "Muslim
terrorists" in Afghanistan that had been

launched only three days previously.

It wasn’t Muslims who were convicted and jailed for six months in 2004 for
fraudulently attempting to
obtain a New Zealand passport in the name of a tetraplegic man;
it was

Mossad agents Uriel Kelman and Eli Cara who were seeking to create a false
identity for Zev Barkan.

It wasn’t Muslims who claimed to know the identity of "suicide hijackers"
Abdulaziz al-Omari and Saeed al-Ghamdi when, since

individuals with the exact same names and other personal details such as birth
date, place and occupation subsequently turned up alive and well, the
population of Saudi Arabia
in 1975 was 7,180,000 and even given a high annual birth rate of
30 per 1,000
and ignoring infant mortality the daily birth rate was only 590 and so it is
highly improbable that individuals would share the exact same name, birth date,
place and occupation, al-Omari’s

passport had been stolen in 1995 when his apartment was burgled in Denver,
Colorado (a
state where Mossad agents have been active), and only utter cretins would
steal the identities of people with a different appearance but having

their exact same name, place, date of birth and occupation, ergo those
hypothetical "suicide hijackers" would have had entirely different names; it was
the FBI who published a list claiming that the 9/11 perpetrators included
Abdulaziz al-Omari and Saeed al-Ghamdi in addition to
several
others who had turned up alive and well, and even though the FBI admitted
that some hijackers may have used stolen identities and that
there is "no
legal proof to prove the identities of the suicidal hijackers," they denied
having misidentified the alleged "suicide hijackers" and refused to change

the names, photographs or backgrounds on their list – albeit obfuscating and
trying to cover themselves by including multiple spellings and aliases.

It wasn’t Muslims who were behind
a
failed coup in Turkey; it was crypto-Jew and Mossad agent pseudo-Rabbi

Tuncay Guney, who

fled to Canada in 2004, and who
in 2001
lived in New Jersey towns that were centers of activity for

Mossad Urban Moving Systems operatives.

It wasn’t Muslims who set up an "al
Qaeda cell" in Palestine;
it was the
Israeli Mossad.

It wasn’t Muslims who had established a reputation for having the capability to stage false-flag terror attacks,
i.e., to target U.S. forces and make it look like the act of a third party, prior to 9/11;
it was the Mossad.

It wasn’t a Muslim who

infiltrated the Pentagon and betrayed his country of birth by selling
classified documents to another country that were then traded to the USSR; it
was convicted spy
Jonathan Pollard whose
treachery
resulted in stolen nuclear secrets being

passed on to the USSR with Israel as the paying intermediary.

It wasn’t Muslims who were running an exercise commencing at 9:00 a.m. on the
morning of 9/11 involving a plane crashing into a tower; it was

officials at the National
Reconnaissance Office, Chantilly, VA.

It wasn’t a Muslim who, in response to the question "Do the orders still
stand?" regarding the response – or more precisely, the
lack of response – to an aircraft
that was rapidly homing in on the Pentagon and ten miles out after both of the Twin Towers had already
been hit by planes more than half an hour
previously, whipped his neck around and replied "Of course the orders
still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?"; it was
Dick Cheney.

It wasn’t a Muslim who was CEO of a company that made
remote control "Flight Termination Systems" that could electronically hijack in-flight aircraft
and steer them into targets by means of a "Command Transmitter System";
it was Rabbi Dov Zakheim.

It wasn’t a Muslim who, well aware that a percentage of trillions of dollars
is still hundreds of billions of dollars,
took a
position as Comptroller of the Pentagon in May 2001 when it was already
public knowledge that
the
Pentagon’s accounting systems were in complete disarray with $6.9 trillion
of "adjustments" having been required in an attempt to make the figures add up,
and with no receipts for $2.3 trillion of these hard to track changes on
non-integrated computer systems and antiquated paperwork that could be readily
taken out by a missile or plane strike on the relevant auditing section at the
Pentagon, and who subsequently

delivered a commemorative sermon on the Pentagon lawn to hundreds of
co-religionists from 40 countries six months after such a terror strike did
in fact occur

killing at least 34 budget analysts / accountants / financial experts; it
was
Rabbi Dov Zakheim.

It wasn’t a Muslim who was

at a breakfast meeting with Donald Rumsfeld when the first plane hit the WTC,
and was at the Army Navy Country Club "when
the plane that hit the Pentagon came right over the top of the Army Navy Club
and bounced down the hill and hit the side of the Pentagon"; it was
Thomas E. White, who
is linked to the Enron
fraud, who participated in

JINSA trips to Israel, e.g.
with his wife
Susan in 1997, and who was
sworn in as
Secretary of the Army on May 31, 2001 which is
27 days after George W Bush
appointed Rabbi Dov Zakheim as
Undersecretary
of Defense and Comptroller of the Pentagon, both
White and
Zakheim having
been placed by Bush at the Pentagon where

more than $2 trillion of transactions had no receipts and Pentagon finances
were vulnerable to a "terror attack" that would target

the appropriate auditing section. 

It

wasn’t Muslims who
in
2000 co-authored a document which called for a "new Pearl Harbor";
it was Roger Barnett, Alvin Bernstein, Stephen Cambone, Eliot Cohen, Devon
Gaffney Cross, Thomas Donnelly, David Epstein, David Fautua, Dan Goure, Donald
Kagan, Fred Kagan, Robert Kagan, Robert Killebrew, William Kristol, Mark Lagon,
James Lasswell, I. Lewis Libby, Robert Martinage, Phil Meilinger, Mackubin
Owens, Steve Rosen, Gary Schmitt, Abram Shulsky, Michael Vickers, Barry Watts,
Paul Wolfowitz, and Rabbi Dov Zakheim.

It wasn’t Muslims who had a motive for employing a "Flight
Termination System" to take control of EgyptAir
Flight 990 – a Boeing 767 –
on October 31, 1999 (after a bizarre coincidence in which "air
crash victims grief counselor" Ed McLaughlin of the Family Enterprise
Institute was the
only person to board the ill-fated plane in Los Angeles and get off at New
York), send it plunging into the Atlantic 60 miles south of Nantucket killing
all 217 on board, none of whom were Israelis but
33 of the casualties were
Egyptian army officers including two Air Force brigadier generals and two
army major generals, and promote the concept of "Muslim
suicide pilots" to a gullible public; it was Jews who would have needed to
conduct a trial run of electronically hijacking in-flight
Boeing
aircraft for their imminent false-flag terror operation that was to be blamed on
"Muslim suicide pilots / hijackers", with the EgyptAir Flight 990 "inquiry"
being

overseen by Zionist Jew Bernard Loeb who had

Jewish translators transcribe the cockpit recordings, and the FBI conducting
a

character assassination to smear the alleged "suicidal" co-pilot.

It wasn’t Muslims who wrote in 1998 of a
"transforming event" rather like
"Pearl Harbor"; it was
John Deutsch, Ashton
Carter and Philip
Zelikow.

It

wasn’t a Muslim who served as
Executive Director
of the 9/11 Commission, whose expertise and job entailed
the creation
and maintenance of public myths or "presumptions", and who
confirmed that the Iraq
war had been for Israel’s benefit; it was Philip Zelikow.

It wasn’t Muslims who published a paper in 1996 entitled
A Clean Break: A New
Strategy for Securing the Realm, which mentioned "removing
Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq" and introduced the concept of pre-emptive
strikes for which some phony

pretext such as halting drug money or striking counterfeiting infrastructure
or "weapons of mass destruction" could be devised that Americans would
sympathise with; it was The Institute
for Advanced Strategic & Political Studies (IASPS) of Jerusalem and
Washington which,
for new Israeli
Premier Benjamin Netanyahu, discussed
how such a
policy would benefit Israel.

It wasn’t a Muslim who, in a 1995 book, predicted that "if
the West doesn’t wake up to the suicidal nature of militant Islam, the next
thing you will see is militant Islam is bringing down the World Trade Center";
it was Benjamin Netanyahu.

It wasn’t Muslim security officials who, in 1991, inspected the garage of a
Muslim shipping company in the World Trade Center and

concluded that the WTC garage was vulnerable to a car bomb, two years before
the WTC
garage was in fact hit by a car bomb and the FBI were aware of the plot yet let
it go ahead killing six people and injuring more
than a thousand, and ten years before the WTC was demolished

one week after the very same shipping company had moved out of the WTC; it was
Israeli security officials and an
Israeli
shipping company.

It wasn’t Muslims who

paid Ali al-Jarrah more than $300,000 for services rendered, i.e., posing as
a "supporter" of the Palestinian cause while betraying his country to an enemy
state, and who was a cousin of Ziad al-Jarrah who was alleged to be one of
nineteen 9/11 "suicide hijackers"; it was Israel that paid this

Mossad asset.

It wasn’t Muslims who 1) broadcast the pilot episode on March 4, 2001 of
The Lone
Gunmen TV series, an episode about
a plot by a secret cabal
within the US government to electronically hijack by remote control a Boeing
heading for Boston and

divert it to crash into the World Trade Center 2) said in the aftermath of
the 9/11 attacks that no one had
ever conceived of aircraft being used by terrorists as missiles to target
buildings; it was 1) Fox TV, owned by
Rupert Murdoch,
a

long-time friend of Benjamin Netanyahu 2)
National
Security Adviser Condoleezza
Rice
/ acting Chairman of
the Joint Chiefs of Staff
General
Richard Myers / President
George W. Bush /
Vice President

Dick Cheney / White House spokesman
Ari
Fleischer.

It wasn’t a Muslim who
said he’d seen
the (first) plane hit the (North) Tower and reckoned it must have been "one
terrible pilot" and "a horrible accident"
before
going into a classroom and subsequently being informed of the second impact
when the first impact was not broadcast live on TV;
it was
George W. Bush.

.

Most Disturbing

Recently, in my letter About Anti
Semitism http://tinyurl.com/yz4ggpo
, I mentioned that I
came across very disturbing publications. They are articles and statements by
Rabbis, imbued with a racism so sordid, that it reminds of the gloomy dark-ages
from which mankind had been distancing itself in past centuries.

I was left in a state of shock and
disbelief, and as I searched a little more, what I discovered and read, was
swelling from bad to worse, leaving me physically sick, nauseated and in an
utter state of disgust, shivering for days.

This may be difficult to read, but
please make the effort to look into it

“There
are two different and distinct entities: the human being, and the Jew who
is part of G-d”

..

“We
are a G-dly people, we have G-dly souls. Our place is in Heaven, in fact higher
than Heaven because Heaven is also a created place, and we are a part of G-d”

…

“The world wants leadership and who are they going to
look to for moral leadership if not the Jews?”

….

“We are to treat other Jews as Divine beings, because
that’s what they are”

(quotes by Rabbi Manis Friedman)

Please, see the
complete post with extended quotes in pdf attachment in the Web-page below

Is Anti-Zionism Anti-Semitism?

This letter was my
response to a Jewish friend (supporter of Palestine), who got upset upon hearing severe criticism,
disdain and sarcasm against “israel” and “israelis”

 He felt that people as they criticise “israel” should not forget the “humanity” of “israelis”,
he also felt that this was a typical behaviour of anti Semitism which caused
him to feel angry and frightened

 ************************************

 About anti Semitism

Talking about anti-Semitism,
and the accusation of anti-Semitism, is to many people a very sensitive issue, nevertheless,
I feel the need to highlight some points:

As a Palestinian and as
a Muslim, with first hand experience of racism, whether here in UK or in
occupied Palestine, I do understand what it means to be subjugated to it; thus,
I deeply empathise with those who suffer from the menace of racism and
discrimination, those who are abused verbally, physically, emotionally, or
otherwise for no other reason than the fact that they are “different”

And I also do understand
the awful feeling and dreadful sensation of being subjugated to subtle racist
looks or remarks, only felt by you and not the people around you

However, I do see a
huge difference between a racist remark directed at a person or a group for
their beliefs, race, or whatever that which makes them different, and between a
snarl, a sneer or sarcasm against an occupying criminal entity called
“israel” and its people for their CRIMES

One must not fail to
distinguish between the rage and fury caused by watching helplessly for decades
the grim unstoppable crimes go unpunished year after year, and the racist blind
hatred that might still exist among a tiny minority who, by nature, would be
hating anything and anyone who is different anyway

Furthermore, this occupying
entity called “israel” (a word that I myself detest to even pronounce
and generally avoid to use) is not a theoretical being, nor does it operate in
a vacuum; it’s neither an abstract concept nor a conjectural void

It’s an entity run by
PEOPLE

PEOPLE who make decisions,

PEOPLE who elect politicians

PEOPLE who ALL
serve in a barbaric army

PEOPLE who foster
racist beliefs, attitudes and actions

PEOPLE who invaded
others’ land, dispossessed them, and forcibly occupied it

PEOPLE who imprison
children and shoot babies hearts

PEOPLE who destroy
world heritage

PEOPLE who steal water,
land, sea and sky

PEOPLE who kill hope, life,
beauty and smiles

PEOPLE who build their
colonies on the blood and ruins of another people

It is an entity of
PEOPLE, 94% of whom voted for the attack on Gaza

It is an entity of
PEOPLE, 71% of whom want U.S. to strike Iran

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/860903.html

It is an entity of
PEOPLE who violated ALL neighbouring countries

It is an entity of
PEOPLE who live on a STOLEN land for over six decades, with no signs of
shame, remorse, awakening of conscience, or willingness to neither admit nor
right the wrongs they’ve committed

Every normal person
with some compassion, would make a grimace of disgust and revulsion when
hearing about such an entity or such a people who commit such
despicable horrors

Now, I find it
difficult to be persuaded that such a reaction to such horrific crimes -when
hearing the name “israel” or “israeli”- is an act of racism (anti-Semitism)

On another note; we –
Palestinians- do not have any responsibility whatsoever for the crime of the holocaust,
nor do we carry the burden of European racism against Jewish people

 Furthermore, I do not see a difference between
any kind of racism including racism directed against Jewish people known as
anti-Semitism. If we accept racism against Jewish people as being different,
then it implies that we accept the racist absurdity of “Jewish exceptionalism”.
Racism is racism, many causes same consequences

 Thus, I do not see the suffering of  Jewish people (horrible as it was) as a unique
kind of suffering which must be revered and viewed as essentially and
fundamentally different from other human suffering; the same way that I do not
see our suffering as Palestinians as unique or different from any other

 Questions come
pounding:

Why is it that we –Palestinians-
are constantly reminded of the horrors of the holocaust, when we had nothing to
do with it?

Why is it that we
Palestinians, are to suffer the same fate as the victims of the holocaust by
the hands of those who brag worldwide to act for “never again”?

Why would the UN want
to enforce the study of the history of the oppressors and occupiers -holocaust-
upon children languishing in refugee camps –who themselves along with their
parents, and grand parents were victims of ethnic cleansing, planed and
executed by those whom they are supposed to feel sympathy with?

Why is it that we are
persistently bogged down by the fixation on anti-Semitism, while for sixty
years (a century rather), we are the ones who are relentlessly suffering
from a most vile evil racism (ethnic cleansing gradually becoming a form of
“final solution”) perpetrated by a whole population of racist zionists?

(with all honesty, I
must tell you that some times I imagine it would’ve been easier and less
painful to us to be gassed and killed immediately rather than this policy of
excruciating slow death that we have been going through for over a century)

How could the world
keep asking us to recognise the “humanity” of a settler, who comes with his
wife and children armed to his teeth, and at gun point evicts a Palestinian
family, throws their entire belongings out, and moves in?

What kind of “humanity”
is this?

And most importantly, why
is it that we are continuously been asked to feel compassion towards our
tormenters who relentlessly murder and humiliate us, who attempt to annihilate
us and our history and why, to what purpose, are we asked to feel their “humanity”,
while their knife still piercing deep in our hearts?

Finally, I cannot speak
on behalf of all the Palestinians, but as for myself, I must admit, the recent
Gaza events was the last straw that broke the camel’s back; before that, I used
to think that there is hope, those PEOPLE would wake up to their “humanity” one
day, and regret the evil that they’ve done, unfortunately, the more I see of
them, the more I realise that this hope and dream was an illusion

Over the past few
years, I have been reading and debating with many of those “soft” zionists in
the so called “peace camps”, all I found is an extremely arrogant groups of
people, who are incapable of recognising, admitting, or willing to rectify the
crimes they’ve done.

 They are only interested in “peace” to protect
their interests and to further secure their grip hold on the stolen land

Moreover, very
recently, and by sheer accident, I stumbled across some honorific information
that reveals the severity of decay of morality and lack of humanity amongst those
RACIST zionists – whose ideological bigotry and chauvinism surpasses
all other- that left me in a state of shock for days; crying, shaking,
suffocating with palpitations and suffering from severe panic attacks. I hope
and pray that I would be one day soon, able to write about the awful reality
that caused so much anguish, distress, shocked my very foundation and
traumatized my essence

   Undoubtedly, the world community should
leave it to the victims to decide how to deal with those criminals in the
future. Only the victims can investigate the fragile alleys of forgiveness or
punishment. The victims should have the last say irrespective of what their
judgment might be, they should not be vilified, indicted or moralized with, for
they have suffered more than enough

The emergence of forgiveness
and reconciliation requires certain conditions:

1)    
Stopping the crime

2)    
admitting of guilt

3)    
 asking for pardon

4)    
 and rectifying the wrong

None of these
conditions are ever considered as an option amongst that mighty sick racist
society

As for me, I have no
authority to talk in the name of all Palestinians, but I can state with all
honesty, I DO NOT wish the zionist murderers, those of whom were directly or
indirectly involved in massacres, theft of land, subjugation and oppression, to
remain in Palestine after its liberation from the occupier.  –except of
course for the very few good people amongst them, as no soul should carry the
liability of another- I do not wish the invader, occupier and criminal racists
to stay in Palestine, the land that they incessantly raped, destroyed and
disfigured, nor do I desire them to be my neighbours

They have shown no
respect, no appreciation, and no love to this land or to her people

They do not deserve to
live there

But these are only my own
feelings, and I know that the decision is not mine.

More on anti Semitism

There
are some more points that I would like to draw attention to:

1)
“israel” calls itself a Jewish state,
and claims to be acting for all Jewish people, by Jewish people.  It is
still enjoying the moral
and financial support of the majority of Jewish communities world wide.
The absence of a huge uproar of denunciation and disassociation by the majority of world Jewry,
makes it hard for people not to blame zionist  Jews who live outside occupied
Palestine for their guilt of complicity, active alliance or passive complacency by either silence or
aiding and sustaining the criminals 

 2) “israel”
still enjoys the protection of the “Security Council” with its US vetoes on any
UN resolution sanctioning “israel’s” endless list of ongoing crimes and
infractions of international law, and the "israeli" criminals still roam with
impunity, free from prosecution by any jurisdiction . This intolerable
situation inevitably foments further rage and fury against the double standard
and special treatment granted to the Jewish state

3)
The excessive use of the term “anti Semitism”:

a)
by zionist Jews, accusing all non zionist

b)
by soft zionists Jews, accusing anti zionists Jews

c)
by anti zionists Jews, accusing fellow anti zionists Jews and also non Jews of anti-Semitism
as soon as they dare to examine Judaism with critical eye, criticising some
aspects of it, some beliefs, attitudes or behaviours

 All this has participated in creating a sense
of repression of freedom of expression, and undoubtedly also a sense of being subjected
to what feels like intimidation and thought control

 It has also diluted the meaning of the word Anti-Semitism, making it practically devoid of any signification. It is now used ad nauseam, ad absurdum, reduced to a simple rhetorical trick, slapped in the face of anything and anyone,
as soon as there is the slightest inspection of facts. The word has
lost its
effectiveness to expose a form of racism, i am afraid. The more we hear
it used inappropriately,  the more indifference its  further future
usage will raise. Worse, it may even -God forbid- contribute to a form
of blow-back   …the story of the boy who cried wolf is only
too familiar

So,
a sincere advice from a heart that cares, to all my Jewish friends who are
really interested in preventing the re-emergence of  real “anti Semitism”, and to those “israelis”
with some humanity left; I would say:

1)
Instead of wasting time searching for the "humanity" within
"israeli" criminals,  focus your energy on fighting and revealing
“israeli” crimes and exposing its inhumanity

2)
Disassociate your selves completely from such an entity and proclaim
this annulment loud and clear

3)
Let go of the idea that anti Semitism is a “special” case of racism; treat all
racism with the same degree of unambiguous condemnation

4)
Try to look at the situation from the standpoint of non Jewish people, who will
not accept or understand the insistence on the uniqueness of the Jewish
suffering, whereas the world has seen since the end of WW2 the massacres of
millions and millions of non Jews.  The world is inflamed by hatred
against Muslims, not against Jews.

5)
With love in my heart, with sincere and and pure feelings, I would appeal to
you to look inwards and search for reasons, as to why  you
feel that the world should accept racism against you as somehow worse or
different, and as to why you feel that your suffering is unique and
unlike others’ , because this is not how the world sees it. All suffering has
the same value to those who go through it, and all racism has the same
consequences and must be ostracized with the same ferociousness

6)
Those of us who are involved in the support of Palestinian cause are inevitably
going to be accused of anti Semitism, that does not make us in any shape or
form anti-Semites, for we know very well that we are not; hence, false labels,
and bogus allegations should not frighten or deter us, distract us or hinder
our determination of doing what we think is right

7)
And finally, please, do not freak out when people point out to certain aspects of
Judaism and the Jewish culture that they might not like or find incompatible
with humanity, equality, or fairness, after all this has always been accepted by other religions, belief-systems and cultures, and this is what freedom of thought and freedom of
speech are all about, people have the right to look at different ideologies, scrutinize
them, criticise them and sieve out what appears to be hindering the human moral
development, as long as all this is done in a non offensive manner, without
slander or abuse, but rather in a respectful, academic, genuine and
good-intentional search for truth

PS:

I know that what I have said might appear too
strong, unfamiliar, or painful to hear, but I can only speak of what’s in my
heart, as I believe that only through openness and honesty that trust can be
built

We have a saying in Arabic; “sadeequka man sadaqak,
wassaddaqak”  

صديقك من صدَقك و صدّقك

“Your true friend is that who is honest
with you and who believes you”

Arabic word for honesty: sidq

And for friend: sadeeq

Both friend and honesty share the
same root: sa-da-qa= told the truth

My love as always

nahida

*****************************************************

The Hasbara Booklet: Just lie.

http://palestinethinktank.com/2009/07/15/the-hasbara-booklet-just-lie/

By Guest Post • Jul 15th, 2009 at 7:17 • Category: Analysis, Counter-terrorism, No thanks!, Education, Hasbara Deconstruction Site, Israel, Newswire, Palestine, Religion, Zionism

WRITTEN BY IBRAHIM IBN YUSUF
(photo from The Israel Project Photo Contest)
The Israel Project’s 2009 Global Language Dictionary
is a Hasbara booklet written by a Dr. Frank Luntz that adds on to a
rich but unsuccessful literature existing in the field. Why
unsuccessful? Let’s quote from the author’s introduction:

Memo to him: the problem is not with his previous booklets, it’s with Israel.

Anyway, here’s the full text (CLICK ON FULL SCREEN TO ENLARGE, THEN ON CLOSE TO RETURN TO THIS BLOG):

The Israel Project’s 2009 Global Language Dictionary –

I see favorably the publication of these hasbara materials inasmuch
as they prove that Zionists don’t actually believe that the world’s
negative view of Israel has anything to do with irrational antisemitism
(otherwise they wouldn’t waste their time trying to convince anyone).
Other than that, I expect them to be professionally made and factually
accurate. So that I did two searches on subjects the "hasbarization" of
which I was curious about.

First, I typed in LOYALTY OATH on the search box. I was surprised to
find no result. Mr. Liberman’s initiative that Israeli Arabs should
take a loyalty oath or be stripped of their citizenship is something an
Israel advocate would be asked about, but this booklet offers no
recipee to fend the questioner off.

Next, I typed in SETTLEMENTS. I did get a full chapter devoted to
them. After listing a few somewhat dated arguments, on p. 63 we get the
formula that summarizes it all:

WORDS THAT WORK
Israel does not talk about dismantling Arab settlements within Israel.
In a democratic society, Jews and Arabs should be able to live
side-by-side in peace. Nobody ever says Israeli territory has to be
free from Arabs. One should ask the Palestinian leadership why they
always demand land that is free from Jews.

Note the terminology shift currently under way. Just like a few
years ago the Jewish immigrants to Israel were suddenly turned into
refugees, and voilà, the
Palestinian refugees were wiped out from the debate, because they
cancelled out with the Jewish refugees, the Arab towns of Israel are
now being termed settlements, and voilà,
there’s no injustice at all: Jewish settlements in the West Bank cancel
out with Arab settlements in Israel. I denounce the Israeli checkpoints
between Jericho and Ramallah, but why do I say nothing about the
checkpoints set up by Arab falafel vendors on the roads of Tel Aviv?

That aside, the Words That Work include something that is not
terminological at all, but which is simply a bare-faced lie, namely
that the Palestinian leadership "always demand land that is free from
Jews."

Up to a very recent time, no one talked about Jews remaining in the
West Bank under a two-state solution. Everyone understood that Israeli
Jews are deeply and unabashedly racist,
and, in order to avoid living under Arab rule, they would be prepared
to accept the unthinkable: higher taxes in Israel proper. Only very
recently has the Hasbara community begun to claim the human right not
to be uprooted from where you went to grab someone else’s land in the
first place. So that the Palestinian leadership had had nothing to say
on the issue, because it was not a subject of debate.

Until now. But on Saturday, 4 July 2009, at the Aspen Institute’s
Aspen Ideas Festival, in, of all places, Aspen, Colorado, Palestinian
primer minister Saleem Fayyad was for the first time ever asked about
his views on the subject. His answer:

“In fact the kind of state that we want to have, that we
aspire to have, is one that would definitely espouse high values of
tolerance, co-existence, mutual respect and deference to all cultures,
religions. No discrimination whatsoever, on any basis whatsoever.

“Jews to the extent they choose to stay and live in the state of
Palestine will enjoy those rights and certainly will not enjoy any less
rights than Israeli Arabs enjoy now in the state of Israel.”

The Zionists went immediately ballistic. They took to the cyberspace
to say, zillions of times "if you believe this I have a bridge in
Brooklyn to sell to you." Others were more straightforward:

don’t listen to them! DO NOT BELIEVE THEM!! the arabs
are very capable of lying and then making life miserable for the
Israelis. and than it might be too late..and they can make horrible
laws too. they have ruled Jews before.

Why were they so furious? Because finally Fayyad had learned the
Israeli technique of making offers that the other side can’t take, so
as to appear as very generous when the offer is actually meaningless.

But the Israel Project’s 2009 Global Language Dictionary chose to ignore this Palestinian display of smartness, and instead instructed the Hasbara gang to lie about it.

Not that the Hasbara gang didn’t know that lying is the approach to take when apologizing for Israel, mind you.

Future of Palestine

We,
the Palestinians, cannot accept any solution that does not address the
MAJOR issues in this lopsided “conflict,” those major issues are:

1)       We are equal in our humanity therefore should be treated equally

2)      We have been wronged; our rights, our land and our identity have been robbed from us and must be given back

3)      Jews
are neither an ethnic group nor a special people, they have no
privilege over us or any other human being, and hence, they cannot
claim ownership of Palestine simply because of their Jewishness

How
could the world expect the Palestinians to recognise Israel’s right to
exist as a Jewish state, when in fact that is not only killing the
dream of every Palestinian refugee of returning home, but it also gives
a precedence to a unique situation.

It
exempts the Jewish people from being treated like the rest of humanity,
as based on their Jewishness alone, they demand special treatment,
preference, and exemptions from all the laws that bind the rest of
humanity:

They demand to take over someone else’s land for a claim that this right is given to them by God

They demand to have superiority over another group of people who don’t share their Jewishness

They
demand that the world should acknowledge their right to go back 3000
years in time based on a claim that some people who share their faith
in Judaism had lived in Palestine in antiquity, yet they are horrified
that we ask to go back to our homes from which we were driven out 40 or
60 years ago!

A cousin of mine, who is Palestinian of course but was working as a teacher in occupied/ stolen Palestine (the zionist entity that some call “israel”)

My
cousin was trying to be friendly to a Jewish teacher, so he said to
him: “you know, we are both cousins, we are all children of the same
grandfather, we must find a way of living together in peace”

The reply of his colleague was chilling

He
said: “yes indeed we are cousins, but you must remember that you are
the children of Hagar, the slave woman, and we are the children of
Sara, the free woman; therefore, you must realize that you the
Palestinians, will be forever our slaves”

This nauseating mentality IS the root of the problem in Palestine:

This supremacist attitude

This arrogance

This contempt of the other

This superiority complex

Firstly:
they justify their attack and occupation of the already inhabited land
of Palestine by a claim of a God-given right made exclusively to the
Jewish people

Secondly:
they see themselves superior with the false claims such as being God’s
chosen people or being light unto the nations or of making the desert
bloom

Thirdly: they want to preserve a Pure Jewish state at all costs; even if that means dismissing the rights of all others

Fourthly:
they, unlike any other nation, are getting away with every violation of
human rights imaginable without ever being held accountable for their
crimes

Are we ever going to see a change of attitude within this community?

It’s only through a real alteration of the Zionists’ mind-set that a solution could become possible

We, the Palestinians, we can compromise, we can negotiate, we can share, we can give much, but ONE thing, and ONE thing only, that we CANNOT negotiate, nor compromise, and that is our HUMANITY

We might be able to forgive the zionists, and move on

We might be able to share our land even with previous enemies

But what we will never be able to do is accept them as our superiors

Nor would we welcome them while they are still committing their crimes of murder, theft and oppression

Reconciliation is only possible with a revolutionary change of attitude within the Zionist community

And that’s is not up to us to do

The ball is in their court now, and has always been

It’s up to the Jewish people themselves who live in occupied Palestine to work on that change, if they want to spare themselves God’s justice

People
can take oppression for so long, but there comes a time when a
threshold is reached, then things could literally change overnight

Their might will not protect them then

What will, is what they’ve managed to preserve of their humanity

As for those who wonder about Hamas:

It would be helpful if you have a look at this scholarly article on Hamas by Khalid Amayreh

http://xpis.ps/Uploadarticles/89articles%20Hamas-Debates-the-Future-monograph.pdf

As
with regards to violence and attacks on civilians, Hamas is not proud
to kill any innocent person, it has continuously offered cease-fire and
a complete halt of attacks on civilians but that was ALWAYS rejected by
israel

Hamas offers to renew cease-fire with Israel

Friday, June 16, 2006

http://edition.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/06/15/hamas.ceasefire/index.html

Israel rejects Gaza cease-fire offer

Sep 21, 2007

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1189411457380&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

Ehud Olmert rejects Hamas’ offer of cease-fire in Gaza Strip

23/12/2007

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/937196.html

Olmert rejects Hamas cease-fire offer

Tue., December 25, 2007

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/937511.html

ISRAEL REJECTS HAMAS CEASE-FIRE OFFER AS HUMANITARIAN CRISIS DEEPENS IN GAZA

April 25, 2008

http://www.csmonitor.com/2008/0425/p99s01-duts.html

Israel rejects Hamas cease-fire offer as humanitarian crisis deepens in Gaza

Fri Apr 25 08

http://news.yahoo.com/s/csm/20080425/wl_csm/odu0425

Coming to the point of israel’s right to exist as a Jewish state I would say:

To
start with; there is no country/ government/ system/ regime on earth
that demands the right to exist and makes that demand “holy” and
unquestionable

Yet again, israel,
with its self-proclaimed righteousness and with the virtue of its
special-ness, feels entitled to ask those whom she robbed them of their
homes, of their dignity, and of homeland to recognise her right to
steal and thrive at cost of their genocide and ethnic cleansing!

Israel feels no shame in demanding to be recognized as a racist entity (as a Jewish state)

Israel
feels no shame in demanding to exist at the expense of hundreds of
annihilated villages, hundreds of thousands of corpses, and millions of
homeless refugees

Israel feels no shame in demanding the right to build its nation on the destruction of another

Israel
feels no shame in expanding what she acquired by sheer brutality at the
cost of devastated landscapes and ruined ancient alleyways

Israel
feels no shame in demanding that the world should adore its glory at
the melody of weeping widows and howling of terrified little ones

Hamas and the Jewish state:

Our
problem – as Palestinians- is not with the Jewish people nor is it with
Judaism; our problem is with the injustice inflected upon us for almost
a century now.

For no crime (except being Palestinians) we were made to be the sacrificial lamb of Europe’s sins, we paid the price for Hitler’s crimes against the Jewish people.

Neither
Hamas nor any Palestinian would have any problem getting along with any
ethnic or religious group of people. As Muslims we’ve done that for
centuries. In fact the golden age for the Jewish people was when they
lived under Islamic rule and as they escaped the inquisitions of Europe to find refuge and protection in Muslim lands.

But,
we have serious problems with ethnic cleansing, injustice, oppression,
racism, fascism, tyranny, and the claim of superiority of one nation
over another.

Unless these issues are justly addressed and resolved, our world would remain in turmoil.

Hamas
are constantly been asked to recognize “Israel’s right to exist as a
Jewish state”; but no one seemed bothered with the fact that “Israel”
never recognized “Palestine” or the Palestinians’ right to exist on
their own land. No one seems to be bothered with the fact that “Israel” hasn’t and never had any defined borders that they want us to recognize.

But most importantly no one seemed to question the morality and ethical grounds on which “Israel” was founded.

Israel
not only has no right to exist as a Jewish state (for the apparent
racism that’s embedded in this definition) but also has no right to
exist as a state and a political system. Period.

Reasons:

 firstly:

The moral and ethical grounds upon which “Israel” was founded are extremely problematic: 

a) When the Zionists adopted Palestine as a home land for all the Jewish people they ignored the fact that Palestine had already its own native Palestinian inhabitants, with a very small Jewish minority of 2.5%.

b)
The early Jewish refugees did not come with a friendly attitude with
intentions to live in peace with the native Inhabitants of Palestine, but rather with the mentality of colonising and ethnically cleansing of the natives.

c)
They did not come with olive branches in their hands; rather they came
with tanks and machine guns, they engaged in extensive terror attacks
on the native Palestinians, they were building their armed forces ever
since until it became the fourth most powerful state in the world today.

d) The natives were never asked and their opinions were dismissed by those powers who decided to give away Palestine -which the don’t own-

e) Israel’s recognition as a state (by the United Nations and the International community) was conditional to Israel abiding by UN resolutions <b>including the right of return</b> of Palestinians; which were never implemented by Israel.

 Secondly:

The
continuous existence of such a state (as defined by the hegemony of one
particular group “the Jewish” over the rest of its citizens) is
deplorable logically, legally, and morally:

a)  Logically unacceptable;

 as by definition “”Israel”
is a Jewish state; in order to maintain its exclusive “Jewishness” it
denies millions of exiled Palestinians their basic human right; namely
the right of return to their homes and their families.

b)  Legally unacceptable;

for
the inability of this entity to comply by the conditions laid out by
the international community, and inability to abide by any UN
resolution.

c)  Morally unacceptable;

 for
the fact that since its inception over the past 60 years, this entity
managed to prove to the world time and again the decay of its moral
fibre; as it sank deeply in the abyss of wickedness and inhumanity.,
through displaying her acts of terror, cruelty, and ruthlessness with
no shame or remorse.

The
continuous existence of such a state is morally questionable; as by
definition “”Israel” is a Jewish state; in order to maintain its
exclusive “Jewishness” it denies millions of exiled Palestinians the
right of return to their homes and their families ignoring their basic
human rights.

When Hitler called for a purely Arian state the world got up in arms against such an exclusive racists regime.

How
can such a state demand the right be recognized and to be secured when
the very foundation on which it was established are immoral? How such a
state should continue to exist when by its very definition it is
insular, exclusive, aggressive and racist?

What
I as a Palestinians would like to see is an all inclusive state of
Palestine, on the whole land of historic Palestine, a state for all its
citizens, where all races, religions living side by side on equal
grounds.

A
state with no walls between its peoples; where no one is denied their
basic human rights for their religious or non-religious beliefs, no one
is denied justice for their race; no one is prevented from returning to
their homes on the basis of their ethnicity. If that should mean an end
to a racist exclusive Jewish state so be it.

(by the way the Jewish state is NOT the Jewish people)

And if I may speak as a mother, seeing my beloved Palestine divided is like seeing my baby chopped in half!

It
pains me enormously, I would rather accept to share my baby with an
impostor mother, who claims my baby as hers, rather than having him
sliced into two pieces

.

"Revoking Israel’s UN Membership."

http://windowintopalestine.blogspot.com/2008/12/revoking-israels-un-membership.html

Excellent article written by two Swedes calling for the revocation of
Israel’s UN Membership. Snorre Lindquist is a Swedish Architect of,
among other things, the House of Culture in front of the Nativity
Church in Bethlehem on the West Bank. — Lasse Wilhelmson is a
commentator on the situation in the Middle East, and is a member of a
local government in Sweden for 23 years, four of which in an executive
position. Lasse Wilhelmson is of Jewish origin and an internet friend.
The other writer’s origin in no known by me but that fact should be
irrelevant.

Ed CorriganStockholm — The
Gaza Strip is now the largest concentration camp in the world. The
situation grows steadily more insufferable for the 1.5 million
Palestinians who live there. Deliveries of food, medicine and fuel are
made difficult or stopped altogether. Child malnutrition is increasing.
Water supplies and drainage have ceased to function. Children die for
lack of healthcare. Tunnels to Egypt, dug by hand, are the only
breathing space. Journalists and diplomats are denied entry. Israel is
planning more military efforts. The Palestinians in Gaza are now to be
starved into surrender and become an Egyptian problem.

The UN
should use the word apartheid in connection with Israel and consider
sanctions with the former South Africa serving as a model. Miguel
dةscoto Brockman, president of the UN General Assembly, conveyed this
message at a meeting on November 24th 2008 with the UN General
Secretary Ban Ki-moon present.

The 1976 Nobel peace prize
laureate, Mairead McGuire from Ireland, recently suggested a popular
movement demanding that the UN revoke Israel’s membership. The
international community now needs to put tangible pressure on Israel in
order to stop its war crimes.

Not once, during the past 60
years, has Israel shown any intention of living up to the requirements
stipulated by the UN, in connection with the country’s membership in
1948, namely that the Palestinians who had been evicted from their
homes should be allowed to return at the earliest possible opportunity.
Moreover, Israel holds the hardly flattering world record of ignoring
UN resolutions.

It can be questioned from the aspect of human
rights legislation whether Israel is a legitimate state. Established
practice between states usually requires borders that are legally
maintained and a constitution, neither of which Israel has. These
requirements are also named in the UN resolution (181) Partition Plan
for Palestine, approved by the General Assembly in November 1947. The
plan was accepted by the Zionists Jews in Palestine but rejected for
excellent reasons as unjust by the Arab states. Only decisions made by
the UN Security Council are mandatory. Later on, Israel unilaterally
laid claim to a considerably larger portion of land than that suggested
by the UN.

The eviction of eighty per cent of the Palestinians
who lived west of the 1947 armistice line, and Israel’s refusal to
allow them to return is the human rights argument for expelling Israel
from the UN. Not only has Israel played the Partition Plan false but
has, by its actions, thwarted the grounds – fragile from the start –
for its UN membership.

Israel makes use of various strategies to
achieve its goals, the same goals as for over a hundred years ago: As
few and as well controlled and weakened Palestinians as possible in
areas as small as possible between the Mediterranean and the River
Jordan. And to try and get acceptance worldwide for the theft of land
that is vital to the “state” that calls itself “Jewish and democratic”.
This obviously bears no similarity to a peace process.

Why does
nobody ever comment on the fact that Israel’s prime minister never
misses an opportunity to harp on about how important it is that the
rest of the world and the Palestinians recognise Israel, not as a
democratic country for all its citizens, but as a “Jewish state”?

What
would we have said if South Africa’s Prime Minister, in a similar way,
had demanded recognition of South Africa as a “white and democratic
state”, thus de facto accepting the racist apartheid system that
allowed non-whites to be classified as lesser human beings?

In
the article The end of Zionism, published in the Guardian on September
the 15th 2003 the Jewish dissident and former speaker of Knesset,
Avraham Burg wrote:

“Diaspora Jews for whom Israel is a central
pillar of their identity must pay heed and speak out … We cannot keep a
Palestinian majority under an Israeli boot and at the same time think
ourselves the only democracy in the Middle East. There cannot be
democracy without equal rights for all who live here, Arab as well as
Jew … The prime minister should present the choices forthrightly:
Jewish racism or democracy.”

No support can be found in The UN
recommendation concerning a Jewish and a Palestinian state for unequal
rights for the citizens of each country. Neither is there any
indication as to how a “Jewish” state could become Jewish. There is
support, however, for the intention that demographic conditions should
be held intact at partition. Interpreting into the text an intention
concerning characteristics of a “Jewish state” tailored to the ideology
of Zionism is wholly in contradiction with the text of the resolution.

Even
the Balfour Declaration, which entirely lacks human rights status,
notes that the Jewish national home in Palestine should in no way
encroach upon the rights of the Palestinians. Neither did US President
Truman recognise Israel as a Jewish state. On the contrary, he ruled
out precisely that formulation before making his decision to recognise
Israel.

Thus, the legitimacy of a “Jewish state” so urgently
sought by Israel lacks support in international documents that concern
the building of the state. Israel’s government is, of course, fully
aware of this. Why else would it keep on searching for this recognition?

The
UN should now embark on a boycott of the apartheid state of Israel and,
with the threat of expulsion from the UN, demand that Israel allows the
evicted Palestinian refugees to return in accordance with the UN
resolutions 194 and 3236.

With this done, meaningful peace talks
can proceed and various solutions be reached for co-habitation with
equal rights for all people between the Mediterranean and the River
Jordan. No such solution can be compatible with the preservation of a
Jewish apartheid state.

– Snorre Lindquist is a Swedish
Architect of, among other things, the House of Culture in front of the
Nativity Church in Bethlehem on the West Bank. — Lasse Wilhelmson is a
commentator on the situation in the Middle East, and is a member of a
local government in Sweden for 23 years, four of which in an executive
position

UN’s "Security Council" won’t revoke "israel’s" UN membership

http://palestinian.ning.com/forum/topics/uns-security-council-wont

By Exilem

An article by Snorre Linquist and Lasse Wilhelmson calling for the
Revocation of “israel’s” membership in the UN, has been recently posted
here in PM, by Telma.
http://palestinian.ning.com/forum/topics/revoking-israels-un-member…

Israel’s UN membership should have never happened in the first place,
given that they are in breach with every fundamental charter principles
of the organization. Today’s transnational web of corruption and
coercion does not exclude the UN, its members, and its core. This call
of revocation is therefor merely symbolic, but has the merit to raise
the question, and to arouse the dulled down mindless public opinion. It
is the right thing to do, but it simply "ain’t gonna happen".

a few excerpts of the UN CHARTER
(emphasis mine)

in Article 3, Chapter II, MEMBERSHIP:
" 1. Membership in the United Nations is open to all other peace-loving states
which accept the obligations contained in the present Charter and, in
the judgment of the Organization, are able and willing to carry out
these obligations."

in Article 5:
"A Member of the United Nations against which preventive or enforcement action has been taken by the Security Council may
be suspended from the exercise of the rights and privileges of
membership by the General Assembly upon the recommendation of the
Security Council. The exercise of these rights and privileges may be restored by the Security Council."

in Article 6:
"A Member of the United Nations which has persistently violated the Principles contained in the present Charter may be expelled from the Organization by the General Assembly upon the recommendation of the Security Council. "

in UN SECURITY COUNCIL’s Membership page:
"The Security Council is composed of five permanent members
— China, France, Russian Federation, the United Kingdom and the United States
and ten non-permament members…"
— Burkina Faso, Vietnam, Costa Rica, Lybian AJ, and Croatia. The 2
years term expires for Belgium, Indonesia, Italy, Panama and south
Africa, and will be replaced in January 2009 by Austria, Japan, Mexico
and Turkey

in RULES OF PROCEDURE:
"Each Council member has one vote. … Decisions on substantive matters require nine votes, including the concurring votes of all five permanent members. This is the rule of "great Power unanimity", often referred to as the "veto" power"

in Article 39, Chapter VII: Action with respect to
THREATS and BREACHES TO the PEACE, and ACTS of AGGRESSION
"The Security Council shall determine the existence of any threat to the peace, breach of the peace, or act of aggression and shall make recommendations…"

The governments of USA, France and United Kingdom, that is 3 out of
the 5 permanent members of the "Security Council" (what a misnomer) are
literally political offsprings of the occupying, terrorizing,
war-mongering, aggressing entity called "israel", and will not
engage in "nine votes, including the concurring votes of all five
permanent members" to sanction their zionist owner, to the contrary,
they diligently vote to promote the zionist owner and given this
context, the following short Article 49 has chilling implications.

Article 49
"The Members of the United Nations shall join in affording mutual
assistance in carrying out the measures decided upon by the Security
Council"

The worm is in the can.

We must face the reality, such propositions and reflections about UN
membership of "israel" are necessary, but they do not have the
detonating energy to free us from the growing internment walls
gradually suffocating humanity. The Zionist entity has hijacked the
system and we have the choice: either we create a tangible movement
destined to tear apart every arcane of their biocidal and ubiquitous
power web and we re-install a civilized system, OR we just give up and
offer our unconditional submission to the World Zionist Order
Organization

For me, the latter is not an option.